Szarka
I've resolved to learn how to cite sources for my contributions. (If you find that something I've written needs a source, please check the appropriate talk page first--in the past I've often noted the source there, if I felt verifiability might be an issue.) Szarka 17:36, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Junior Mance
editAnd thank you for the thanks! I havent found a "guideline" for placement of stubs, but everyone I've ever seen is at the bottom of the page (including at Wikipedia:stub). I know there has to be a guideline, but damn if I can find it! :) It's sometimes confusing, because the "stub" template indicates that the article needs expansion . . . but I think the idea is that there i a more specific label for those articles that need expansion or wikification; category and stub information is usually at the bottom. Cheers! Ronels talk 00:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
Doctress
editHi - regarding creating an article as you mentioned, I think it would be fine to create one. The article was deleted via our proposed deletion process as there was no objection within the stated time frame. If you'd like, I can find the deleted article and provide a copy for you in your userspace to use as a starting point. The most important issue would be to document notability (e.g. according to the WP:BIO criteria) using reliable secondary sources. Please let me know if you have any questions. MastCell Talk 23:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Dana Blankenhorn
editAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dana Blankenhorn. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Blankenhorn. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:36, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Dana Blankenhorn
editI have nominated Dana Blankenhorn, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dana Blankenhorn (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Omarcheeseboro (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of songs written by Cole Porter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Which (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Szarka. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Well done on fixing the XTC article for Andy, and supplying the Twitter links.Gagitsel (talk) 13:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)