Violations

edit

@T.simons0623:   Please stop committing violations on Wikipedia like you did with the article Alpha Motor Corporation, if you keep committing violations on Wikipedia an administrator will block you from editing. Please read Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:No legal threats, Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry and Wikipedia:Edit warring. Catfurball (talk) 16:19, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please stop falsely accusing new users for violations based on personal opinions of your associated 'experienced' user. I see that you have never contributed to the article, I would recommend reviewing contribution edits to see how new information properly cited with verifiable sources. As they were deleted without proper reasons other than an 'experienced' user's personal hunch. You are contributing to a person's agenda to prevent newcomers from contributing to Wikipedia. T.simons0623 (talk) 02:15, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 02:28, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Alpha Motor Corporation) for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Star Mississippi 15:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Alphamotorcorporation per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alphamotorcorporation. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 20:15, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Reply