User talk:T3h 1337 b0y/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Hand Sanitizer: citation needed

On 6 Aug 2010, you added the following sentence to Hand sanitizer:

• Even so, assuming 99.999% germs killed, in 5:20, the effect wears off.

Please provide a reference. Also, please explain and/or clarify your assertion that the effect wears off in *exactly* 5 minutes and 20 seconds.

List

Hi! I saw you were involved with a previous nomination for deletion of List of suicides in fiction, and felt you should be informed of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of suicides in fiction (3rd nomination). Thanks!--Yaksar (let's chat) 17:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:User 17-4

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:User 17-4, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Acather96 (talk) 19:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Blanking of user pages

Regarding this edit to User talk:69.228.90.50, please note that WP:BLANKING states that "policy does not prohibit users, whether registered or anonymous users, from removing comments from their own talk pages, although archiving is preferred", so this edit was acceptable. Please note that once content is removed by an editor on his or her user page, it should not be restored, except for the exceptions listed at WP:BLANKING. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Huggle edits

Please stop abusing your huggle tool, or it will be revoked. Huggle is only to be used for uncontroversial reverts/warnings. Thanks,

Speedy deletion nomination of Posigrip

A tag has been placed on Posigrip, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:T3h 1337 b0y/User 17-4

User:T3h 1337 b0y/User 17-4, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:T3h 1337 b0y/User 17-4 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:T3h 1337 b0y/User 17-4 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:42, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Book:Editor war

Book:Editor war, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Editor war and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Book:Editor war during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 11:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Has your account been highjacked?

Considering that there is no reliable source anywhere that makes this claim, I would usually consider this edit[1] to a biography straight forward vandalism, but I notice that you have been actively reverting vandalism. Has your account been high-jacked? LK (talk) 05:40, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

I actually did that because I was frequenting Conservapedia, and it said that. Sorry! T3h 1337 b0y 05:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Before posting such an inflammatory proposal, you need to have reliable sources - even though Keynes is long dead, it is regardless inappropriate to suggest that as fact without solid reference sources. Conservapedia is not in any way a reliable source. Risker (talk) 05:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

December 24 2011

A recent change I made to an article, Warren Hills Regional High School, was simply an undo of a previous change I had made. I can see why it would have been considered unconstructive as done by an IP user, but I wanted to inform you that I had simply made the change without logging in, and again, was reverting an earlier edit. Regards. Smartalic34 (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:List of bees of Israel

It would seem that a bot net is being used to revert user talk:Supreme Deliciousness comments on Talk:List of bees of Israel. Four removals in a few minutes by four different anons! Jim1138 (talk) 07:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Make that five. T3h 1337 b0y 07:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Book:Editor war

Book:Editor war, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Book:Editor war (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Book:Editor war during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Oh thank you. Didn't mean to delete anything. Sorry.

April 2013

Hello, I'm Mabdul. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Usenet because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! mabdul 23:10, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

It's all in good XKCD fun. T3h 1337 b0y 23:11, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes, and? Please don't fool the reader by changing the article space (and templates used in the article space). mabdul 03:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm MisterShiney. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Walking Dead (TV series) was undid because it didn't appear constructive. If you think A mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! MisterShiney ✉ 23:58, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maryland Route 147. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Apparition^{11 Complaints}/Mistakes 01:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Excessive use of templates

Your recent handling of new editor 3060... was a bit heavy handed to say the least. You put FOUR warnings on his talk page over the course of nine minutes, hardly sufficient time for him to see the first one, reverted all the erroneous edits without any sort of edit summary, then reported him to WP:AIV without any sort of feedback that would help the editor understand what he's doing wrong. Meanwhile, a cursory glance at his pages and what he's done makes clear he is a) young and b) so new at editing he hasn't been welcomed yet. I see you've had some issues with vandalism yourself, but taking it out on a newbie is hardly constructive editing. Instead, it could be interpreted as harassment. Easy does it. --Drmargi (talk) 03:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)