March 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Ocean's Three and a Half, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 04:34, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, that is a violation of the WP:NOR policy. Was this reported in a secondary news/media source that satisfies our policies of reliable sources and verifiability? Cirt (talk) 05:07, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, I just saw it. I won't be able to prove that the Scene wasn't in there till it's on Adult Swim Video, and even then it will only be there for a short time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TBone777 (talkcontribs)

[1] = Please undo this edit. Simply adding a link to http://www.adultswim.com/schedule is not appropriate and does not back up your assertion. Please undo your last edit and instead engage in discussion on the article's talk page at Talk:Ocean's_Three_and_a_Half#Left_out_of_Adult_Swim. Cirt (talk) 06:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reported to WP:ANI

edit

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TBone777_violating_WP:NOR_despite_warnings Cirt (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing, NOR violations. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Philippe 05:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Welcome

edit

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

  • Respect intellectual property rights - do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
  • Maintain a neutral point of view when editing articles - this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Gman124 talk 16:00, 10 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Talk:FOX-y Lady has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CTJF83Talk 22:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of Xavier: Renegade Angel episodes, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Iwreckyou (talk) 01:15, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Redesigning the Seinfeld Project Page

edit

Hello TBone777. I have been working on redesigning the main page for the Seinfeld WikiProject at this page. So before I went on and changed the main page, I wanted to ask all the members how they felt about it. So could you take a look at it and give any suggestions to improving it at here. Thank You. --Gman124 talk 16:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Episode 34

edit
 

The article Episode 34 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable episode lacking any coverage by reliable third-party sources. Article title is too ambiguous for a proper redirect.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 19:25, 12 June 2010 (UTC)Reply