With so many parameters and so many ways in which to order them on a line, there will always be different opinions about what goes where.
National, regional, continental and global lists have different purposes and may require different parameters.
Header is made to be 2-3 lines high to keep the list narrow.
Capital expenditure could be used instead, but it seems to be different from Capital cost, as 4C charges money to show CapEx, but cost is readily shown. TGCP (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- Looking good, isn't it? So many options, so many different ways to do it. The row template offers the chance to do left/center/right aligns easily, and to put in blank columns, or to put columns in a different order, or miss some out, without having to change all the content pages. Might be nice to do the template with named parameters, to make it more self-documenting.
- Detailed Danish stats are here, from where it's easy to calculate capacity factor. ErnestfaxTalk 22:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- It took me a while to understand what you have done, and it is pretty sophisticated, but it also seems easy to use for us non-experts. Let us move it further. TGCP (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- very nice. So, what's the next step? ErnestfaxTalk 08:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- I would say; merge ernestfax5 with this one, and let us discuss which parameters to use and in which order. I don't know how much coords are used, maybe they should be in the middle again. Should we ask others about their opinions before putting content in? TGCP (talk) 14:25, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- If we can get capfacs for half the entries (4 out of 7), then it should be included. TGCP (talk) 14:28, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- very nice. So, what's the next step? ErnestfaxTalk 08:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
- It took me a while to understand what you have done, and it is pretty sophisticated, but it also seems easy to use for us non-experts. Let us move it further. TGCP (talk) 19:35, 2 August 2010 (UTC)