This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

THL.Larkfeast (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

THL.Larkfeast (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC) I have not conducted vandalism, there was no reason given. Unprofessional conduct and false accusations by INeedSupport please block that userReply

Decline reason:

You were indeed given a reason above; edit-warring. Creating alternative spelling versions of articles ("chilli pepper") is also not helpful. You've already been blocked at this IP for edit-warring about the spelling of chili/chilli. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:27, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ Amory (utc) 19:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I'll just make a new account, thanks