TJN92

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giant Readymix Logo (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kb.au was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giant Readymix Logo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Giant Readymix Logo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kb.au (talk) 08:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, TJN92! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kb.au (talk) 08:37, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

@Kb.au: Hey Kb, Thanks for the warm welcome! Regarding the notability of the subject of the "Giant Readymix Logo" page - What you said regarding its coverage is true in that it is fairly minor but over a long period. However, I would argue that the subject is notable as 1) as far as I can tell, the GRL (Giant Readymix Logo) is still the largest advertisement in the world and 2) the GRL is one of the largest geoglyphs in the world, with some articles listing the GRL as the largest geoglyph in the world - although from what I can tell that title is more likely to be the Marree Man, with the GRL or Mundi Man a close second. Furthermore, I would suggest that the level of notability is equal to that of similar subjects. Many existing pages on geoglyphs have a similar level of detail/notability as this one - especially those on hill figures. Many pages on Australia's Big Things also have a similar level of detail/notability. I do appreciate the fact that you admitted it was a tricky one though - sorry for making it so difficult for you, haha! Finally, if you still aren't convinced I would suggest that RMC Group would certainly be one option for a merger, but that merging into "Caiguna, Western Australia" may be a better fit as that is where the GRL is located, after all? Cheers! TJN92 (talk) 14:13, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for starting up this discussion. Like I mentioned, it's a hard one to gauge the notability of especially given that it's atypical to have articles specifically on advertisements. I agree that if the subject was any other geological feature, the question of notability would be less controversial. The article is written well enough and the referencing is there, so I will move it to article space for the time being. I can't see how it would be harmful to do so. Either of the merges you suggested could be an idea for the future if others think it doesn't meet the notability bar. Kb.au (talk) 14:32, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giant Readymix Logo has been accepted

Giant Readymix Logo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kb.au (talk) 14:34, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

caiguna

one small problem with most of the anecdotal material is that it is WP:OR - there are no WP:RS. Please try to make sure blocks of assettins like that are qualified in some way with WP:CITE - thanks. JarrahTree 14:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (North Adelaide Golf Course) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating North Adelaide Golf Course.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 16:18, 25 March 2019 (UTC)