The Idiot Apologizes

edit

You are 100% correct in that you were actually removing duplicate text. However, that does justify your personal attacks in calling me an Idiot. In the future, using an edit summary to explain why you are removing huge portions of an article is a good idea.(I actually did but this Bitch never READ the article.) 69.181.249.92 07:01, 26 August 2010

Edits to Erik Morales

edit

Hello, I know you are trying to do the right thing with the section blanking of this article. I too was keyed in to the large removal of text but noticed that you are in fact removing large amounts of duplicated text. I must warn you though, that your mini "edit war" with 69.181.249.92 has caused you to violate Wikipedia's Three revert rule. Please be careful, even when trying to do the right thing. Turgan Talk 07:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of José Luis Benítez

edit
 

The article José Luis Benítez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX, never won pro title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 02:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Horatio García

edit
 

The article Horatio García has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOX and WP:GNG. Non-notable career as an amateur and pro.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sandro Marcos (boxer) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandro Marcos (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Marcos (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2.O.Boxing 20:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply