User talk:Tachyon01/Archive1

Archives from January 1 2006 - May 20 2006

  • Please do not edit this page.
Archived Discussion

Click on "Post a new message" above to leave your comments

edit
  • Questions, comments, suggestions, blah..., leave them here. Be sure to sign all comments, otherwise they will be deleted. Tachyon01

Semi-protection

edit

With reference to [1], please be aware that adding the tag does not actually confer protection onto the article. It must be protected by an administrator, who will then add the tag on. enochlau (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Also, you wrote on Nrgetik that "This article was previously voted deleted to prevent trolling via concensus for speedy deletion." However, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nrgetik, the reason for deletion was because it used to refer to a non-notable band member. If you wish for it to be deleted, please choose another reason. enochlau (talk) 12:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am aware of both instances. In reference to both points, i believe that was the third time that article had been created, the first regarding the reason I listed above. About protection, I'll keep that in mind for future reference. Considering the article was made by an anonymous source who I had been cleaning up all night, I thought it would be best to stop it somewhere. In any event, the article has been deleted. Thanks for your input. Tachyon01

Kwon Sang-Woo's real surname is Kwone.

edit

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v377/tccn/KwoneSangWoo.jpg

read this, it's his real passport though he has to renew this yr 3 may

I am a fan of KSW, I know more than your info has.

he really has a girl in 1998 surname Li.

his father die when he is 8 is not fake.

I am his asian fan , i have more details of kwone than your wikipedia had.

i don't know why adding correct details is being called spamming?

if your pedia has, do I have to add mine?

your page is opened for people to change what they got from kwone sang woo, but you all just change back from your own fav. words. then why ask ppl to change?

why not just close your own door and change all your own...?

I don't like your staff's way of treating changes. you don't know, doesnt mean nobody knows kwone's other details that your page doesn't have.

please open all your brain, and heart to receive others' real details.

I find you not willing to receive people sending their known details.

edit

if only you admins or staff of wikipedia (the details only by you all, the others must give wrong details) are all true things, and can only be qualified into wikipedia, then why open for ppl to send their own details?

why not just close your door and change all yourself?

if you really not willing to receive people's changes, then why ask ppl to send changes?

that is what I wish to laugh at.

you US people won't know much on Kwone sang woo. at least we asians got his passport and can still prove that he surname KWONE not KWON.

sorry but you staff are too arrogant. that you are not willing...you all are too arrogant that you won't listen to people's changing to your details, the ordinary undetailed (not enough details) profiles

I believe that, wikipedia doesn't contain enough details of kwone sang woo. at least i know much more than you got.

Dispute

edit

I beleive my comments on the "Hijab" page were correct, and can provide sources from a "neutral point" of view. All schools of islamic thought agree on this pretty much, including many shia forms on ahulbyat.

Prod

edit

Just a couple of friendly reminders in regards to Joe Pautsch, which you proposed for deletion. First, please use an edit summary when proposing deletion. Edit summary usage is always good, but it's especially important for {{prod}} because {{prod}} is not supposed to be added twice to an article, and edit summary usage is how we can tell that. Also, I marked Joe Pautsch for speedy deletion. In cases where it applies, speedy deletion is preferable to proposed deletion. I left the prod tag, though, just in case for some reason an admin rejects speedy deletion. Thanks! Mangojuicetalk 14:00, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Plate tectonics and continental drift

edit

How is what I added "nonsense?" The scientists of the time DID ignore actual, physical evidence because it lacked a unifying theory, and the scientific method clearly dictates the evidence be considered before any theoretical constructs. I added a link to "paradigm shift" for those who wished to pursue this line of inquiry. As continental drift is one of the most recent examples of human emotional resistance getting in the way of the objective advancement of knowledge, it seemed to me to be a legitimate and useful link.