User talk:Tachyon01/Archive2

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Fritz Saalfeld in topic Image Tagging Image:Amphoteric.jpg

Good Catch!

edit

Thank you for your vigilance on reverting the speedy delete. Kukini 07:00, 3 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


Continental drift

edit

I moved my comment down to "the debate on continental drift" rather than in the intro section. I aim to please, let me know if I have failed to do so. (I admit this is the first time I've done other than add a media mention of a subject or erase a bit of obvious spam)

Eminem

edit

Eminem is not black, but he IS African-American. Three of his grandparents are South African.

It's what he is

edit

It's what he is

AfD

edit

Just a friendly reminder to leave in your edit summary "AFD" (or something similar) when nominating an article for deletion, as you failed to do so for Istory. Pepsidrinka 03:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • Yup, missed that one. I realized that as soon as I hit the save button. Thanks. --Tachyon01

Big Sur - thanks for the help!

edit

Thanks for taking the time to read the article and clarify the weather section.Scooterboss 11:38, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

  • You're welcome. I happen to live near Big Sur, so I clear up anything else I find. --Tachyon01

Welcome to VandalProof!

edit

Hi Tachyon01/Archive2, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Once again congrats and welcome to our team! - Glen TC (Stollery) 03:57, 16 May 2006 (UTC)Reply


Kwon Sang-Woo's real surname is Kwone.

edit

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v377/tccn/KwoneSangWoo.jpg

read this, it's his real passport though he has to renew this yr 3 may

I am a fan of KSW, I know more than your info has.

he really has a girl in 1998 surname Li.

his father die when he is 8 is not fake.

I am his asian fan , i have more details of kwone than your wikipedia had.

i don't know why adding correct details is being called spamming?

if your pedia has, do I have to add mine?

your page is opened for people to change what they got from kwone sang woo, but you all just change back from your own fav. words. then why ask ppl to change?

why not just close your own door and change all your own...?

I don't like your staff's way of treating changes. you don't know, doesnt mean nobody knows kwone's other details that your page doesn't have.

please open all your brain, and heart to receive others' real details.

I find you not willing to receive people sending their known details.

edit

if only you admins or staff of wikipedia (the details only by you all, the others must give wrong details) are all true things, and can only be qualified into wikipedia, then why open for ppl to send their own details?

why not just close your door and change all yourself?

if you really not willing to receive people's changes, then why ask ppl to send changes?

that is what I wish to laugh at.

you US people won't know much on Kwone sang woo. at least we asians got his passport and can still prove that he surname KWONE not KWON.

sorry but you staff are too arrogant. that you are not willing...you all are too arrogant that you won't listen to people's changing to your details, the ordinary undetailed (not enough details) profiles

I believe that, wikipedia doesn't contain enough details of kwone sang woo. at least i know much more than you got.

Dispute

edit

I beleive my comments on the "Hijab" page were correct, and can provide sources from a "neutral point" of view. All schools of islamic thought agree on this pretty much, including many shia forms on ahulbyat.

My Talk Page--Thanks

edit

Thank you so much for reverting the vandalism to my Talk Page. I sincerely appreciate the effort of wikipedians such as yourself. =) --Alphachimp talk 00:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

you wiki staff should be lenient, accept the provided changes.

edit
don't know why you always keep saying people uncontributed.

you are not expert of everything. just make an encyclopedia. but the details are not enough.

then people send their known things, then you say, because no facts supported, so we won't accept any

Your ways is just telling people that, you only think that you are the correct ones.

if so, then why not just shut your doors of let people sending their changes to you?

I don't know why can you guys be so arrogant.

Listening to your own mistakes can help improve wikipedia. you may be contributing by creating this page, but your demerit of not listening people, would be hated by people one day.

there are really some people who are as bad as you, only blame people idiots, stupid, not contributing. finally they got eliminated one by one. you can refer to BioHazard Extreme site's rammy.

many people know him for ill-temper and arrogant, exactly same as you wiki guys. finally your ending will also be the same. your page will die. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.40.137.201 (talkcontribs)

Only bad admins, and bad sites would make ppl to come to insult you, you can't stop.

because you admins have no brain. so I can come to say sth.

I love how they think that you are on Wikipedia "Staff". --Alphachimp talk 01:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Alphachamp is only user, don't forget, Iam not wiki staff, and I am glad of this, because wiki staff already offended lots of ppl who just send changes to some celebs, who the ppl know more than the staff, then the staff, who think that only themselves are the correct, only keep delete, keep change your things.

this kind of site won't succeed any longer. this kind of site would die within 5-10 yrs.

see some sites, esp. a biohazard/resident evil site, it's famous, but webmaster as arrogant as wiki's, and his site die within 6 yrs (1998-2004).

Because if you decide to be so unwelcomed, so notorious to ppl, and keep delete ppl's changes just because they are not wiki's staff, that only make your site to get killed.

you easily get things on nerves because you are nervous type

edit

because you think that only you are useful, due to wikipedia staff status, but ignore ppl's changes is already a fatal mistake.

you can block me or delete my post

edit

but the mistakes your staff had made, by delete or alter what ppl had sent on celeb's changes, would never be reconciled, not only with me, many ppl also hate your way of change back things.

and also, not only this, ppl's hatred on you and your site won't get killed off

you can only block ppl, delete their things, but your site's imfamy won't change.

maybe it's famous, but the webmasters has personality problems, and too arrogant, never admit that they don't have enough detials, that is truth.

Esplanade in Winnipeg

edit

I have received a notice that I "vandalized" the page regarding the Esplanade bridge in Winnipeg, Manitoba. Although I do understand the arguement, I am from Winnipeg and can assure you that what I edited is accurate. There is no vandalism from my edit and would appreciate it if it were reverted. Verification of my claim can be found in Wikipedia by searching 'Glen Murray'.

Thank you.

You made the following addition to the article:
"Others however view it as a phallic symbol largely in part to the homosexual mayor Winnipeg had at the time of conception."
You provided no sourcing for your addition, and in the wiki article you suggested I look at, it made no references to the above statement. If this is your personal opinion, keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Please see What Wikipedia is not.
Tachyon01 16:15, 29 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

sorry

edit

was just experimenting

red giant vandalism

edit

my apologies for the five billion years in the "red giant" article being changed to five years...i am currently at work and left my work station, at which time some young surfer-punk decided it would be funny to edit the page to make it seem as though we only have five years until the sun transforms into a red giant-class star. Fear not, the boy has been dealt with. and it wont happen again.

i must say im really impressed (as im sure every person who does something stupid on wikipedia is) by how quickly you caught that change. However, i find it an indesputable fact that Meatloaf is a complete joke, etc.

thankyou for your time, Richard Trey Largo

however, i understand that this sort of vandalism undermines what you're trying to do. i use wikipedia often, and i am sorry. it wont happen again.

Not technically "vandalism"

edit

I was just editing some guy's User page in retaliation for him doing the same thing to me.


Yes, it is vandalism. If you edit his page in retaliation, that is vandalism. If he vandalized your user page, don't do the same thing to him. Instead, report him to an administrator.
Also, do not blank vandalism warnings from your user page, that happens to be vandalism as well. Tachyon01 05:02, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

take a look at the original entry - it was gibberish - dirga therpa? what's that?

University of Santa Cruz

edit

Dr. Williams works in the Physics department. Just trying to make the world smaller.

yeah, i'd noticed the Santa Cruz connection in your profile. Anyway, never having communicated with anyone on Wikipedia before, does every message I send show up on your page as a public thing or is there a sort of e-mail message center feature here?

Stander Film

edit

The movie Stander starring Thomas Jane does contain gratuitous footage of his penis. Watch the god damn movie before editing the entry.

No need to get hostile, lets be civil here. I noticed in the edit history for Stander (film) article that the comment you refer to has been reverted out on at least four other occasions. First off, the edit I assume you contributed to the article is clearly not of a Neutral point of View, but reads like an opinion. Secondly, that line is really unnecessary for the article. I've seen no such references to what you speak of on review sites or IMDB. People can watch the film and make judgements like that for themselves. If you have questions, please leave me a message. Tachyon01 02:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply


Image Tagging Image:Amphoteric.jpg

edit
 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Amphoteric.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 11:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)Reply