Tadamsmar
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Medicine WikiProject!
editWelcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Medicine (also known as WPMED).
We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of medical articles here on Wikipedia. I noticed that you are interested in editing medical articles; it's great to have a new editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing Wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on our talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the WPMED talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- Sourcing of medical and health-related content on Wikipedia is guided by our medical sourcing guidelines, commonly referred to as MEDRS. These guidelines typically require recent secondary sources to support information; their application is further explained here. Primary sources (case studies, case reports, research studies) are rarely used, especially if the primary sources are produced by the organisation or individual who is promoting a claim.
- The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle. If you encounter any problems, you can discuss them on an article's talk page or post a message on the WPMED talk page.
Feel free to drop a note on my talk page if you have any questions. I wish you all the best on your wiki voyages! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:02, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Re:GA review of Parent Management Training
editHi, I've replied to a couple of points you made at its GA review. I made a mistake about WP:BOLD (as in "be bold") and MOS:BOLD. I rarely fail articles, but when I reviewed it I found out that it didn't meet the "well written" part of the criteria and also the lead could do with some work. If you plan to renominate when its ready, feel free! I'll be more than happy to review it again. JAGUAR 11:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Tadamsmar, I've been asked to close the recent GAN to this due to inactivity. Don't fear, please contact me when you log back on and I'll copy the same reviewer over to a new one when you're ready (seeing as they're going to be identical). Regards JAGUAR 19:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Parent management training
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Parent management training you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 13:40, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Parent management training
editThe article Parent management training you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Parent management training for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Parent management training
editThe article Parent management training you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Parent management training for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Tadamsmar/Incredible Years parent training, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 03:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's Incredible Years is dead link in this page:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Parent_management_training
- It's a important treatment for behavior problems. SandyGeorgia seems to have some clout on these matters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SandyGeorgia
- Don't go deleting Incredible Years from that other page without consulting some experts.
- I am sure that Incredible Years is an OK topic on Wikipedia. But I have never finished the page, so you can delete it if you want. Tadamsmar (talk) 23:51, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Incredible Years
edit
Hello, Tadamsmar. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Incredible Years, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Incredible Years
edit
Hello, Tadamsmar. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Incredible Years".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:32, 4 January 2024 (UTC)