User talk:TaerkastUA/Archives/2014/October

Latest comment: 10 years ago by 130.245.251.218 in topic Tekken 7


Tekken 7

That is the type of reasoning that makes wikipedia pathetic. Mark my words, Tekken 7 will inevitably be announced for PlayStation 4. There has been no release DATE but it is foolish to not leave the information on Tekken 7 page there. So just leaving "PlayStation 4" next to "arcade" in platforms makes SENSE, it does NOT make sense to remove it. if you had a problem with it, why not add to the talk page on Tekken 7 instead of uppin removing it? Osh33m (talk) 01:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Actually, I am sorry for being harsh before. Mark my words though, Tekken 7 will be announced for Ps4. And when that happens, ask yourself, 'would it have hurt to have it on the wikipedia back then (now)?' go to the tekken 7 talk page and look at the evidence I have left there. I seriously think it would be mistaken NOT to have Ps4 written for platforms on the Tekken 7 page. instead of being so by the book, please try to listen to reason. Osh33m (talk) 05:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
OK, thank you. I am glad we are able to see eye to eye on this matter now. People have been trying to edit in PC/Windows next to it but I think we can agree that nothing else should be added now.
Also, I didn't know sources were discouraged to be added in the info boxes. Metal Gear Solid 4 has the playstation 3 platform sourced in the info box. just sayin. Osh33m (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
TaerkastUA, we need to do something about those people who keep putting in microsoft windows as a confirmed platform for tekken 7. because it's not, and there's no reliable information on it. he tells us to "google it" instead of leaving a source there himself.Osh33m (talk) 15:56, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Mm. Going by the sources, I'm not too sure about it being released on the PC just yet. It's better to leave PC out for now--Tærkast (Discuss) 18:57, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
TaerkastUA I agree but this person keeps on adding it to the page. can we make it so that they can stop doing it? it's technically an edit war right now.Osh33m (talk) 05:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Well, take it to the talk page is the first step, then request page protection if necessary.--Tærkast (Discuss) 12:01, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
TaerkastUA That person cannot be trusted with the talk page. He edited IP's 129.49.10.153 section and added Windows to it making it very misleading. I say we go straight to page protection since the problem is persistent.130.245.251.218 (talk) 16:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Judicial Appointments Commission may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *#[[District Judge]] '''[hristopher Simmonds'''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Judicial Appointments Commission, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District Judge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 25 October 2014 (UTC)