TajuAyinde
TajuAyinde, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi TajuAyinde! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC) |
Your contributed article, Winning Jah (Musician)
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Winning Jah (Musician). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – W.Jah. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at W.Jah. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MassiveYR ♠ 22:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello i don't see reasons why Winning Jah's page was deleted for one it was not a duplicated page, not a copyrighted material page, two article eritten recently were nominated for deletion an originator of a certain art style is worth a wikipedia notability for educational purpose, two he has millesstones, it is not all about local or grammy awards, fame and innovations needs to be applauded, if someone wrote the article before, that was not my headache, the article was relevant, this time i saw kind of hatred in this topic, this Musician's article is becoming boring, you guys can create it when you feel is ok by you, thanks. (TajuAyinde)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GEE JAY is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GEE JAY until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 14:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Winning Jah (Musician)
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Winning Jah (Musician), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 01:00, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello i don't see reasons why Winning Jah's page was deleted for one it was not a duplicated page, not a copyrighted material page, two article eritten recently were nominated for deletion an originator of a certain art style is worth a wikipedia notability for educational purpose, two he has millesstones, it is not all about local or grammy awards, fame and innovations needs to be applauded, if someone wrote the article before, that was not my headache, the article was relevant, this time i saw kind of hatred in this topic, this Musician's article is becoming boring, you guys can create it when you feel is ok by you, thanks. (TajuAyinde)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Winningjahofficial (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
TajuAyinde (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have never used wikipedia before, this sockppuppet stories has been sorted out last week with other users, i am working from a music library, i am tired of this harassment, here is the library link am chatting from https://www.worldcat.org/libraries/195861?backfrom=libraryProfile&searchTerm=pinerolo&start=1&count=10&libTypeNum=0&sortBy=rel, stop this insult we all need to be respected and appreciated for contributing, were are not here for promotional purpose but to educate others, please understand thanks
Decline reason:
Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 12:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.