Talking image

Talk:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 08:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I think I have not violated anything. I commented on the talk page. Talking image (talk) 00:57, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Brad Pitt

Please explain how this fails verification. The opening sentence of that article says: "Bono and Brad Pitt brought their star power to the kickoff of the One Campaign on Wednesday, calling on people to come together to fight the global crises of AIDS, hunger and poverty." It is used to support a statement in the article that says "Pitt supports the ONE Campaign, an organization aimed at combating AIDS and poverty in the developing world." Seems fairly verified to me. Also, when you tag something as "failed verification", please do not tag it twice. The tag should follow the citation, not added twice. [[User:Wildhartlivie|] (talk) 03:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I am very sorry. Since apparently you reversed the edit, I can't tell without a bother, to what you are referring. All I can say is that I checked out each reference carefully. You reverted a tag on a source that was not correct by my finding instead of fixing it, which is what I expected. Perhaps I will object on the FAC, if this is your pattern. Good luck in your FAC endevours. I was about to support, especially if you had addressed the problem, but now I will not. All the best, Talking image (talk) 03:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked as yet another obvious sock. --Andy Walsh (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)