Tamar Chkhartishvili

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Tamar Chkhartishvili! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: EUt+ (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OnlyNano was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EUt+ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OnlyNano^talk 01:15, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

I should also mention you have not fixed any of the sourcing errors, so that is still going to apply. I would suggest you add more sources before you resubmit. OnlyNano^talk 01:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi!

I have a question, I tried to fix everything, also sources, they are official EU sources and University website, I do not understand how can I correct it. can you help? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Sure! I declined your submission because it's not written in the correct tone that you would see in an encyclopedia. In your case, it is written in a promotional way. There is word choice such as "cutting-edge" and "innovative." While they might have an innovative program, this comes off as promotional, and unencyclopedic (as your goal is, in terms of tone, to write in a formal tone). You can check out this page on encyclopedic tone to get more information about what we're looking for in terms of tone.

Additionally, in terms of sources, we actually want to steer around primary sources (such as a universities page, if they are involved in the program). Instead, a great source would be a newspaper which wrote an article about EUt+. They are independent of the topic. You can find a great sourcing guide here. A great example of a source you picked very well was the Le Monde article.

A small suggestion would be renaming the "Contact" section to "External links," as that can appear promotional. Though there is no issue with simply providing a link to their website.

If you need more help, or have completed those changes, I'd be happy to re-review the article, if you'd like! OnlyNano^talk 14:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey, I modified my article and trying to publish the changes but it says "No stashed content found for 1233814434/10cc3dcf-3f23-11ef-8b3d-01e0acf07608"- what should I do? Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Hmm, that seems like a technical issue that's above my knowledge. I'd suggest creating a thread at the Teahouse, that way someone can take a look at what's going on. OnlyNano^talk 22:52, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Hey! Thanks for a tip, I published the new version, can you have a look? I think on this time it should be good Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 12:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Of course :) I'm making some minor edits, but there seems to be a lot of opinion-based content and still a bit of promotional wording, but I'll take a look and edit what I can. OnlyNano^talk 00:52, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you so much, this is my first ever experience to publish something in Wikipedia and it is really important for me, I really tried to change every sentence and make it neutral tone as much as I could. Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

No problem, you're still new to all of this! Take a look at some of the comments I left (they are invisible, but you can see them in the editor), and let me know when you make some of those changes! I didn't want to rework your entire article, so I left some things for you to decide :) OnlyNano^talk 15:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I hope you have a good day, thank so much for your help, I looked to your comments and made change, can you have a look? I think, this time it should be good ^^ Tamar Chkhartishvili (talk) 08:45, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good, I'll go take a look right now :) OnlyNano^talk 15:41, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: European University of Technology has been accepted

European University of Technology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OnlyNano^talk 16:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)