Tamasine22

3 March 2016

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please log on for today's event here. Leutha (talk) 12:00, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Extant Theatre Company

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Tamasine22,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Extant Theatre Company for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 14:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Extant Theatre Company

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I'm Rasimmons. Tamasine22, thanks for creating Extant Theatre Company!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I may be overtagging, but I'd suggest writing a lead for the article and finding some more neutral, independent sources to reference within the article, as it seems many are directly connected to the subject. Thanks for your time.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. Simmons ^Talk 15:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Thanks for your message. That's great feedback I'm looking into amending the article but may take a few days!Tamasine22 (talk) 15:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jamie Beddard, from its old location at User:Tamasine22/jamie beddard. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 12:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamie Beddard (January 13)

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Current sourcing is simply not enough and this would need all additional major reviews. There's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone, no press releases, trivial passing mentions or interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamie Beddard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:50, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic