Thank you for feedback!

edit

Hi Tammy, my name is Thomas. I'm the student whose article you edited during the 'peer review' portion of the Languages in Peril class. I just wanted to drop by and thank you for the feedback you left. All suggestions were appropriate and genuinely helpful. Good luck. Tjr128 (talk) 16:46, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello!

edit

Hi Tammy, this is Sarah. I'm also a student with Professor Haberl, just saying hello! Satomasello (talk) 17:01, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Tammy! I'm Imani, and I'm also a student in the Languages in Peril course. I'm hope you're having a great semester so far. Take care! Inr7 (talk) 18:48, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Tammy083, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:29, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

Hi Tammy, I think you have some good information such as the Rashad family and its two similar dialects. I think the structure of tour lead section is clear. However, I think you could include more details about the language itself, such as the grammar structure and the phonology (if it is possible). The tone is natural and those sources are reliable. I just think besides the Rashad family, it would be better to include the structure of the Tegali language.Catherinezeng (talk) 16:49, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review - Bhavishy Venigandla

edit

Hello Yueming. I enjoyed reading your article. I believe that you have a great framework on which to build the rest of the article on, as I have no doubt you shall add on to it soon. I also have some criticisms. Firstly, there is no citing of your references within the introduction. Wikipedia links will typically cite to references, even in the introduction. I suggest that you do that so you cannot be accused of plagiarism. I would also suggest to add on to your references list. If you go on the University Libraries page at Rutgers, you can find books and online resources to aid in this. For example, I cited a book that I found at Alexander Library that was created in the 1800's for the historical context. I found the formatting of your References list and the sidebar to be acceptable. I would also suggest to add sections like "Grammar, Morphology, Syntax". The details of which can be found at this link:Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages/Template. I am going to be using that template in my own article, It helps me think of new sections to add and can give me a bit of an idea as to what I need to do. I am looking forward to seeing the article transform into a wonderful reference in the weeks to come!