Question on Tinkle CSD script

edit

Hi! I saw that you flagged my new article BiggerPockets for CSD. Was that a manual action based on your review? Or was it something in the Tinkle CSD module that flagged it? Asking because my new article is not substantially identical to the deleted version. I wrote the article from scratch, although you can see that I pulled the prior article from the deletion archives last month- it was basically worthless so I just started over. Nickgray (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Stephen Schneider (actor): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned.

 

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.


 


Crunch, crunch!

Here are some chips to go with your fish!

-- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 22:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merhaba

edit

Çalışmayan linkler devlet yardımları siteme yönlendiriyorum anında iptal ediyorsun ayıp 85.105.111.61 (talk) 11:22, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Portlaoise Plane

edit

Hi Tanbiruzzaman. Thanks for your message. My edit was genuine, not a test. There is much interest in the historic Portlaoise Plane consequently I listed my new book which tells the fascinating story of the search for a plane missing for over 50 years. Thank You. Downwind141 (talk) 09:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just for your interest/info

edit

Hey I thought I’d just let you know that some edits you reverted recently (Special:Diff/1156945193) were the work of users under a sockpuppet investigation, and some of them have already been blocked. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2021Porto Final. Fork99 (talk) 20:25, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Question from Legend Manqele (23:42, 10 June 2023)

edit

Hi there, when will my article be published? --Legend Manqele (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hey @Legend Manqele, welcome here. If you're talking about this, then click on Submit your draft for review!. Before submission, make sure you've completed the writing of the article. → Tanbiruzzaman 💬 06:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks a lot for dealing with that LTA on December 13! Appreciate it! -- Prodraxistalkcontribs 12:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Question from Snuchie (08:24, 26 June 2023)

edit

Hello. I'm new here. Before editing one must research a topic ? Why other articles are protected ? --Snuchie (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2024

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Salman Fazlur Rahman shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thewikizoomer (talk) 18:25, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply