User talk:Tariqabjotu/Archive Forty-Five
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Main page FPThanks for getting the protected version up so fast, I'm not an admin so i couldn't do that part :P fetchcomms☛ 00:33, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
NYC Wikipedia Meetup Sunday, March 21
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Day NYC, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Lights Camera Wiki, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example User:ScienceApologist will present on "climate change, alternative medicine, UFOs and Transcendental Meditation" (see the November meeting's minutes). In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. And if the weather is good, we'll have a star party with the telescopes on the roof of Pupin Hall! You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list. To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. Excessive Edit warring in Kochi articleThe user:Gantlet is again edit warring with the article Kochi. He is reverting the article to an older version. I have seen from the talk page that you have blocked him earlier. Please block him again. He is even having some sock usernames as well. Gantlet is having multiple accounts such as User:Trock95 and Bubluonline. He is editing with anonymous IPs. Also, please dont include me also in the same category. I was just trying to prevent him from his wierd revisions. Please see the history here: [1] Thank you, --Dewatchdog (talk) 16:19, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:37, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:39, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thank youThank you Now I know how things go hhhhhhhhhh Trabelsiismail (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2010 (UTC) The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, do you think the "80 deaths in Uganda" ITN nomination under 23 April is ready for the Main Page? --candle•wicke 19:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:27, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
ITN/CHey, there are two items that seem to have consensus under WP:ITN/C#April 29 if you have a moment. Thanks for the support in my RfA, btw, it's very much appreciated. All the best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
expo front page pictureare you going to add the picture that Arsonal posted to the front page? I think its a good one. What do you think? StanStunDon't waste your time arguing with this dreadful fellow. He/she/it is a sock of the banned User:Shuppiluliuma. See the SPI here for evidence [2]. Athenean (talk) 19:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Main Page ImagesYour recent actions led to File:VolRenderShearWarp.png being on the main page for 30 min unprotected. βcommand 00:34, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
ReconsiderPlease see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Savant1984_and_User:Zargulon_.28Result:_Protected.29, where I asked you to reconsider. Debresser (talk) 17:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC) A post by Savant1984, who is willing to come to an understanding, and another post by Zargulon which is provocative and factually brands him as a disruptive editor, are the basis for a renewed request to reconsider this case on Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Savant1984_and_User:Zargulon_.28Result:_Protected.29. Debresser (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Network 21Hi, while I concur with your decision to lock the article, you have left it in a state where it leaves in serious allegations in a court case against the company, but has left out the fact the case was dismissed. The other two editors involved have continually deleted that fact, despite it being sourced (to the actual court dismissal document). It was that action I kept revertíng. IMO the article should not be locked in a state where it is inaccurately libelling an active organization.--Insider201283 (talk) 11:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
PosekThank you for informing me about the correct interpretation of WP:3RR, I accept that I my explanation of it was not correct. Zargulon (talk) 23:05, 5 May 2010 (UTC) Since you're online...I need to turn in, it's getting on for 03:30 here, but I'd really appreciate it if you could keep an eye on United Kingdom general election, 2010- I've desperately tried to avoid semi-protection, so if you could keep an eye on things for a few hours, you;d be doing me and the encyclopaedia a great service. There's an editntice up warning of instant block for vandals so you could just block them until the results are all in. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Planning Discussions Now Underway Regarding DC Meetup #10
I find this difficult to understand. This editor persistently edited against consensus and reverted at least five times in a matter of hours. Other editors were trying to reach a consensus-based version of the article and this was being disrupted by Jetblack500. Can you explain how you came to your decision here, please? If you have an explanation for why it took so long for this report to be dealt with, that would also be of interest - a noticeboard that doesn't work isn't likely to get a lot of use. Thanks. --Michig (talk) 13:59, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
"Forces" vs. "Soldiers"Hey, just so you know, I reverted your change of "forces" to "soldiers" on ITN. I agree that, with the new wording, "forces" is not ideal- but there were RAF personnel involved, for example, and they're most certainly not soldiers. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:52, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
NYC Wikipedia Meetup Saturday, May 22
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikimedia Chapters Meeting 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wiki-Conference NYC and Wikipedia Cultural Embassy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the March meeting's minutes). In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list. To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. Request for inputHJ Mitchell has closed the AE request I filed concerning the BLP problems on Richard Goldstone and essentially remanded the issue back to the editors. This isn't the outcome I'd expected; it's being discussed at User talk:HJ Mitchell#Why the closure?. Since you commented on this matter on AN3, you might wish to provide some input - it would certainly be very welcome. -- ChrisO (talk) 01:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
|