Speedy deletion nomination of Natasha Sibiya

edit

Hello Tashy Diva,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Natasha Sibiya for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Balon Greyjoy (talk) 11:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This page should not be speedily deleted because I am a public figure and I’m a brand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tashy Diva (talkcontribs) 12:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 13:53, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

I made a mistake and now I know that I shouldn’t have edited other pages besides mine. I admit my wrong doings and will not do it again ever. Please unblock me so I can manage my page. Tashy Diva (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Athaenara 16:44, 12 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tashy Diva (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23753 was submitted on Jan 12, 2019 16:54:09. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2019 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tashy Diva (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23754 was submitted on Jan 12, 2019 18:07:10. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 18:07, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Information about conflicts of interest and editing Wikipedia

edit

  Hello, Tashy Diva. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 16:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)Reply