User talk:Taylor Trescott/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Odd redirect

You redirected a talk page to the associated article, which is not generally done. Unless you have a good reason for this, i will remove the redirect. If a != vote was placed by mistake on the talk page instead of the AFD itself, that misplaced != vote could be moved to the AFD, couldn't it, with an explanatory edit comment? Edison (talk) 01:23, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I only mention it because I was at the AFD and saw that the talk page was non-blank, so I clicked on oit to see if someone was arguing some point of order or whatever, and found myself back at the AFD. It took a couple of minutes to figure out what had happened. The only question is to blank it, delete it, or just undo the redirect. Edison (talk) 01:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

I removed the redirect and just left the blanked talk page, so any curious reader can verify that the one editor actually left a != vote there which someone copied to the main AFD. I agree that we should be careful about making permanent encyclopedia articles out of every lurid crime story, but this one rises a bit above average. Let's check back in a year or 2 and see then if it needs deleting. the better approach would be to create articles out of news stories only after years have passed, and then keep the ones with more than a splash of coverage, i.e. ones which led to new laws, or which became notable books or movies, ones which became permanent memes (like Typhoid Mary) or ones which every literate and informed person in a country is likely to have heard of. Sadly, we still have Balloon boy hoax 4 years later! Edison (talk) 01:56, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

AFD Kyle McMahon

Hey Taylor - You had mentioned you found no sources for singer Kyle McMahon A cursory Google search (logged out of Google) shows the #1, #2, #4, #6, #9 results are all for the subject. National press includes: Washington Post, NY Times, MTV, etc. Subject is currently getting airplay on MTV, has had 2 national / international releases, one through the 2nd largest record label in the world, and has appeared on 4 Oprah shows in the last 3 months. I would seriously argue that alone is enough for inclusion on Wiki. FeerTheDeer FeerTheDeer (talk) 15:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

AFD Kyle McMahon Follow up

Hey Taylor - I hope you don't think I'm personally attacking you. I do understand what you mean now about not getting your point regarding Other Stuff Exists. In any event, I did add a bunch of links to the Talk page, let me know if you need anything else. And I know you're just trying to keep the site great, as am I! Talk soon. FeerTheDeer (talk) 23:19, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Good Article RfC

Hi, I think you have mis-understood the proposal you commented on - GA status is not required, it would be optional so those who create new articles will not be disadvantaged :) --Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 02:54, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Ah ok, thank you. The idea for proposing GA was that it would encourage improvement and expansion of more important topics, like Paris or Sea (both GAs this year) that wouldn't be able to be expanded 5 times.--Gilderien Talk|List of good deeds 03:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Luther the Geek

Alex Shih^Talk 00:03, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Wendy Beckett - Playwright speedy deletion

Hello, I deleted this cause the creator blanked and because there are copyright issues-- it needs a total rewrite. And therein lies the rub. Someone took the trouble to write about her. Her curriculum vitae clearly shows her to have significance, if not notability. Dlohcierekim 01:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cars 3

Allen3 ^talk 00:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheyenne Rides Again

Thanks for the withdrawal Tony. I think I'll have a go at improving it myself later today. Best, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 13:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

You have a new message!

Hello, Taylor Trescott. You have new messages at Talk:Band Geeks/GA1.
Message added 04:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mediran (t • c) 04:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Taylor Trescott. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kicking Zombie Ass for Jesus.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

• I think a redirect to the director is fine for now as I aded sourced information to that article. We can always undelete if this thing begins filming. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Decampitated

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:OneChancePoster.png

Thanks for uploading File:OneChancePoster.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Frank Schryver) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Frank Schryver, Taylor Trescott!

Wikipedia editor MatthewHoobin just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You may want to add some more material to the article.

To reply, leave a comment on MatthewHoobin's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roads to Vegas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danny Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coffin Baby

Agreed fully with your assessment at AFD and went to work. I was able to build upon your contributions and improved the article quite a bit. Might you consider upping your support from "weak"? Best, Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for re-visiting. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 16:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Ring of Terror

Hello! Your submission of Ring of Terror at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gamaliel (talk) 23:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Barnstar

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		To Taylor Trescott for putting together the Jimmy Neutron (franchise) article as an answer to questions and comments at a related AFD. Building content is the way to go. Nice job. Schmidt, Michael Q. 17:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Ring of Terror

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Deaths in 2013

I'll reply to your comment on my talk page here because I have a dynamic IP address and it could change without warning. You said: "We don't remove names from the list until one month has passed." But that is not true. If someone were to add to the list, for example, the death of their next door neighbour, it would be removed right away because the list is not supposed to include every death that happens, just the deaths of notable people. If a person dies who is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page, but does not yet have one, they can be included on the list for a month in order to encourage people to create such a page. If it is not clear whether or not a person is notable enough to have a page, they can be listed as well (and the question of their notability will be settled only if a page is created for them and someone nominates it for deletion). But when a person is clearly not notable enough to have a Wilipedia page they don't get to stay on the list for a month. They can be removed immediately. The two I removed fall into that category. One is a bodyguard to the stars no one has ever heard of before he died. The other is a hockey player who has never played in a top professional league or for a national team. They are not notable, just like my next door neighbour and yours. 99.192.72.29 (talk) 22:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

The rule is that "Many notable people die before a Wikipedia article is written about them. The regular editors of this page have agreed that a redlink may remain for one month after the death, so that an article may develop. If there is no article after one month, then the death notice is removed from the list." If you wish to challenge it, head to the talk page. (You should probably create an account if your IP is dynamic.) Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

You have not read my comment carefully. The passage you quote refers to people who ARE notable, but die before a Wikipedia article is created for them. I removed the names of people who are NOT notable and, as a result, do not have an article. I do not disagree at all with the rule. 99.192.72.29 (talk) 23:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

It is not "if the person is notable, they get to stay, but if they aren't notable, they leave." It never says that. It says that a redlink may remain until after one month. Everybody who tries to remove a redlink gets reverted. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:42, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

So if my next door neighbour dies I can add her to the list? I bet you $100 if you ask about that on the "Deaths..." talk page you will find out that that is wrong. Over one hundred thousand of people die every day. The page only lists the clearly notable people (whether red or blue linked) and the possibly notable ones. But not everyone who dies. 99.192.72.29 (talk) 23:49, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

If you want to remove a redlink, get consensus at talkpage. For now, consensus is to let redlinks stay unless the community agrees to ditch them. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 23:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

If you believe that consensus is to let ALL red links remain, even if it is my next door neighbour, then you are wrong. I will now go to the talk page there and prove it to you. 99.192.72.29 (talk) 00:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

You owe me $100 :-) 99.192.72.29 (talk) 01:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Lost episode / Alfred Hitchcock

Hiya, I noticed your deletion of some info at Lost episode, here and I was curious to know why you deleted it; it wasn't clear to me from your edit summaries. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Please share your opinion on Samuel Westrop

Hi. I happened to see your vote on an article that was nominated for deletion, just one section below another entry which I'm currently opposing. So I randomly decided to kindly ask you and the other two users - only if you want of course - to take a quick look this article. Then, I'd really appreciate it if you could vote either for(delete) or against(keep) its deletion proposal, because I'm convinced that more views are needed there and think yours can be trusted. Thanks in advance, Yambaram (talk) 23:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roads to Vegas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roads to Vegas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adabow -- Adabow (talk) 21:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roads to Vegas

The article Roads to Vegas you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Roads to Vegas for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adabow -- Adabow (talk) 22:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Roads to Vegas

The article Roads to Vegas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roads to Vegas for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Adabow -- Adabow (talk) 00:12, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Check Your Guns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jerry Thomas

The Projected Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

SSSN FAR nomination

Hi Taylor - I have placed your FAR nomination of She Shoulda Said No! on hold. The first step in a FAR nomination is a notification on the article talk page that you see problems with the article's quality that could lead to its removal as a featured article. This notification must be given far enough in advance of the FAR that interested editors have time to read it and respond, if they wish. This is more than the 8 minutes that elapsed between your talk page notification and your initiation of the FAR. Due to this, I have placed the FAR nomination on hold until the proper time period has elapsed. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions, Dana boomer (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gunslinger (1956 film)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gunslinger (1956 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Erachima -- Erachima (talk) 02:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)