Tdoyle

Please feel free to leave messages for me here

Thanks for the welcome!

NickBurns

Hey, saw your note to NickBurns; just thought I'd drop by and say hi. -- Essjay · Talk July 3, 2005 06:23 (UTC)

TaxAlmanac.org

In such case I apologize. The conditions looked quite suspicious - new or anonymous editors put external links into several pages of high importance. The edit on Intuit didn't suggest it is anyhow related to the company. Pavel Vozenilek 02:48, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

Frisco DFW Template

Yeah.. I knew frisco was somewhere around 70,000 now. I also know that Mansfield has skipped past 50,000. But the rest of the cities in the listing are using 2000 Data, so I figured it would only be fitting to leave everything in its 2000 state. No one will notice, and it most likely will not matter because people will refer to the most recent data available.. so.. okay, moving it to the 50,000-100,000 section is fine. im glad there are other people who keep an eye on DFW articles.. thanks for your input. Drumguy8800 05:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Ya know what, actually, just kidding about the Mansfield thing.. apparently they only have 34k per the 2004 census. I was thinking of an article where the city was trying to get a "population 50,000" sign put in even though the population hadn't hit that marker yet. silly mansfield. Drumguy8800 05:56, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Manipur Bush Quail

So, having spotted the BBC story, I searched for the Manipur Bush Quail. No-one had created it yet, so I spent a few minutes writing it, and then I found that... you'd got in and done it about three minutes earlier! I've added the binomial authority, but basically just wanted to say, good work! --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 16:12, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Image needs replacement

Hey there...

I am going through a number of images that have some minor licensing issues. I came across Image:KillCreekPresbyterianChurch.jpg which you uploaded. The licensing on this image is not complete as it was uploaded many years ago. I wonder if you could follow the link to the image page and correct the licensing with a GFDL license (or other free license). If you have any questions or issues, please drop me a note on my talk page. Thanks. --Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tdoyle. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Otterberg in Germany.png

The file File:Otterberg in Germany.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)