TeachTeachTeach

Welcome!

Hello, TeachTeachTeach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GermanJoe (talk) 11:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Wiki-linking out of context or with tangential information

Hello TeachTeachTeach, Wiki-links should only be added in related articles in relevant context. Just mass-adding tangential commonplace statements in various articles to arbitrarily place such links is not a suitable method to connect articles or to popularize unrelated topics. All content in an article should be directly relevant for its primary topic, without tangential or off-topic information.

So the placement in Educational technology is probably fine (imo), as the mention of MOOCs directly adds some substantial detail to this topic itself and both topics are closely related with each other. Other mentions in largely unrelated articles such as Marketing or Curriculum vitae don't add such directly-relevant contextual information (in hindsight, I haven't explained this aspect of Wiki-linking very clearly in our previous discussion). Another important point: even if new information fits into an article topic-wise, it must be sourced by independent reliable sources nonetheless (see WP:V and WP:RS for more information) - ideally all content should be sourced and verifiable to independent reliable sources.

I hope this helps to clarify a possible misunderstanding from our previous discussion, but please feel free to ask if you have further questions. GermanJoe (talk) 19:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of MOOCs has been accepted

List of MOOCs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 04:57, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

• Hello TeachTeachTeach, I have also moved the originally provided references into the new list, and made the necessary attributions per Wikipedia:Splitting. That guideline is quite lengthy (and a bit bureaucratic imo), but I recommend to read it in case of further article splits. All re-uses of Wikipedia content need to be attributed in some way due to copyright reasons. Anyway, thank you for your constructive contribution - I hope you continue to edit in other similar areas in the future. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 11:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)