TechSciEco

AfC notification: Draft:Cecil Konijnendijk has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cecil Konijnendijk. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:56, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for alerting me to this! I had not known these pages existed. Is there a good way for me to integrate or link this together with the article I have created? Still new here and learning. TechSciEco (talk) 12:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 3:30:300 rule for greener cities (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Devonian Wombat were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:3:30:300 rule for greener cities and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, TechSciEco! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil Konijnendijk has been accepted

Cecil Konijnendijk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:3:30:300 rule for greener cities

Hello, TechSciEco. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3:30:300 rule for greener cities, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2024 (UTC)