TechnicalRestrictions587

Supercoolman356

Supercoolman356, Is a very competent person I have never met someone smarter and hardworking than supercoolman356. Few things about supercoolman356 He has died he is now known as iShaddi_DefendLaw. Few ranks he has or holds, Chief superintendent Winnipeg Police Service Newdale Police Department Chief superintendent, TRD Tech Executive chief Regina Police Service Chief of Police Banham State Police Superintendent Banham Police Department Chief Superintendent Vancouver Police Department Cadet Mano County Deputy Sheriff Do you want me to keep going Supercoolman356 has held many ranks he's even in RCMP as a Constable and in Regina's RCMP as a constable, So as you can see Supercoolman356 is hard working and the best person I've had the pleasure to meet.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TechnicalRestrictions587

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A tag has been placed on User:TechnicalRestrictions587 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 02:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 29)

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be a test edit or possibly eevn an attempt at 'humour'. It is not suitable for the encyclopedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TechnicalRestrictions587/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:TechnicalRestrictions587/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello, TechnicalRestrictions587! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 07:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:TechnicalRestrictions587/sandbox

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, TechnicalRestrictions587. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 07:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic