Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see
If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
- Policy on neutral point of view
- Guideline on external links
- Guideline on conflict of interest
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Caspian blue (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
July 2008
editThanks for experimenting with the page Tribute on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Is there a problem to describe the historical fact on Japan from "the same source" in which also Korean relation with China is referred to or you may use on May? For equality, we both use the same one.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back
editI think we can compromise the content for "equality", however, you used the same source but distorted info twice. We should stick to sourcing. You seem unable to read Korean language properly, so I understand your mistake on the interpretaton If you have any question on the source that you use, please let me know. I would gladly help you.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
당신은 한자를 읽을 수 있습니까? 역사서의 원문은 한자입니다.원문을 읽고 나서 기술해 주세요.--Teconv (talk) 04:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- 무슨 소리하시는건가요? 거기 원래 붙어있던 소스는 "한국어"로 기재되어 있습니다. 그걸 그대로 기술했는데, 무슨 문제가 됩니까? 고대"로부터" (from) 와 고대"에는" (in) 차이가 있습니다. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Samguk Sagi의 원문은 한자입니다. 당신은 원문을 읽었는지요?"You seem unable to read Korean language properly" korean language ? Samguk Sagi is Chinese character.--Teconv (talk) 05:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- -_- Look, the Empas citation that originally several Japanese anons inserted is written in Korean language. Generally, people think that Korean language is written in Hangul. I don't understand why you asked me whether I read Samguk Saki or not. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
필사..--Teconv (talk) 05:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- 이상한 한국어 좀 쓰지 마시고 (그럴 때는 "필사적이네요"라고 쓰셔야죠. 그것도 상당히 기분나쁜 말이긴 합니다만..), 논점에 집중하세요.--Caspian blue (talk) 05:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Not third century, but fourth centruy, so please fix the info.
editYou distort the information again. Not third century, but forth century. Please stick to the original source. You can just ask me about the Korean source. --Caspian blue (talk) 04:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
잘못해--Teconv (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- 무슨 소리신가요? -_- ;; --Caspian blue (talk) 04:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
朝鮮
editAre you indicating Korea as Gojoseon with the hanja? You inserted the wrong info again. In Japan, either ancient/Joseon/North Korea are collectively referred to as 朝鮮, but not in English. The translation is also inaccurate because Han Dynasty was disappeared after AD 220. -_-;;. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
괴로운 변명을 하는 사람이다-_-;;— Preceding unsigned comment added by Teconv (talk • contribs)
- -_-;;;, 인신공격 좀 하지 좀 마세요. What are you talking about? You inserted the wrong translation. You must fix it from Han China to just China. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
끈질긴 한국인. 무섭습니다.--Teconv (talk) 05:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- 네, 제가 의지의 한국인인 것은 어떻게 아셨어요? 틀린 정보를 넣으면서 정보를 왜곡하는 것보다야 덜 무섭지요. 얼른 정보를 수정해주세요. 안그러면 님에 대한 인식이 무섭다에서 더 한 것으로 바뀔 것 같습니다. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- 나는 바쁘기 때문에 나갑니다.
날뛰지 않게 주의해 주세요.--Teconv (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2008 (UTC)- The strike-out sentences are personal attacks, so you must refrain from doing so. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:32, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- 나는 바쁘기 때문에 나갑니다.
Regarding your comments on User talk:Teconv: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.--Caspian blue (talk) 05:30, 30 July 2008 (UTC)