Telecomtom
Although I agree with much of what the RTSP page contains, I'm worried about some of the terminology, specifically the absence of any discussion of RTSP methods. For example, I'd be happier if we referred to the PLAY method and the PAUSE method instead of the PLAY and PAUSE requests.
Alternatively, could we at least mention that methods are the actions that the client requests the server to perform on an object ("The method indicates what is to be performed on the resource identified by the Request-URI")? That might also entail a brief description of the client-server model whereby client messages are requests and server messages are responses. In that context, the PLAY request would be understood to refer to a message, sent from the client to the server, with a PLAY method. Similarly, a PAUSE request is a client-to-server message whose method is PLAY. Further, a PLAY or PAUSE response would be understood as a response by the server to a PLAY or PAUSE request.
There is a possible complication that someone might want to investigate: The draft rfc2326bis lists a few requests that can be initiated by the server: "RTSP messages consist of requests from client to server or server to client and responses in the reverse direction." GET_PARAMETER, OPTIONS, PLAY_NOTIFY, REDIRECT, SET_PARAMETER, TEARDOWN -- messages with these methods can be sent in the S->C direction (from server to client). I think this means that in some circumstances a server can initiate request; I'm not used to that kind of behavior, but, hey, it's the IETF and anything goes. But right now I don't have the time and energy to pursue the matter. May others succeed where I fall flat.
But as I said, the page is probably alright as it stands as long as none of the IETF syntax gurus read it too closely.
-- TT Telecomtom (talk) 18:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Three pictures of quantum mechanics
editThere are three pictures of quantum mechanics: Schroedinger, Heisenberg, Dirac or Interaction. In chapter 1 of Introduction to Modern Quantum Optics the authors briefly describe the three pictures and indicate the criteria for choosing one picture over another. Those criteria are descriptive power and ease of computation. It might be a good idea for the section Mathematical_formulation_of_quantum_mechanics#Pictures_of_dynamics to have an introductory paragraph that does likewise. Telecomtom (talk) 00:19, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Discretionary Sanctions alert
edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 03:56, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Turing switch for deletion
edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turing switch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.