User talk:Teratix/Discussions about redirects are costly

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Cheap counter argument

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've been participating in some arguable unnecessary delete discussions lately because some editors believe for reasons that are unclear to me that inadequately sourced articles on non-notable topics should be deleted rather than redirected. It is a lot less overhead to boldly blank and redirect these articles than to send them to AfD or even PROD. If the redirection is deemed inappropriate, any editor can undo it at any point. Again. much cheaper WRT editor and administrator time than recreating the article or visiting WP:REFUND. ~Kvng (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic