User talk:Terminy

Welcome!

Hi Terminy! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! BlockArranger (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

More specifically, (the above is a message automatically created by a tool I use) I have noted that you also seem to take an interest in dealing with our personality disorder content. Admittedly, some of it is not really in optimal shape, but we can absolutely get it to a better level. I believe it important to spread accurate knowledge about these very common but severely misunderstood conditions at Wikipedia, as it is a very popular source of information. If you want to collaborate on anything or need help, be sure to hit me up on my Talk page, or, for things more specific to articles, use the Talk pages; I watch all personality disorder articles as far as I am aware, and several others, too. Anyway, big welcome! BlockArranger (talk) 12:04, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for your kind message. I'd certainly refer to you for future help. As you see, I'n into personality disorders and psychotherapy, but I'm quite new in Wikipedia! Thanks again for your welcome. Terminy (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good Psychiatric Management has been accepted

Good Psychiatric Management, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 24% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BlockArranger (talk) 22:25, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schizotypy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schizotypy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Evolutionarily Informed Psychotherapy

The article Evolutionarily Informed Psychotherapy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

LLM-generated article, hard to discern the core of the subject.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:09, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello LaundryPizza03

I wrote this page personally. It may sound a too much academic style...but I'm not a AI!

I have now revised the very introduction to make it clearer to a general audicance, and I will review and improve the entire page accordingly.

The topic of the page is grounded in well established clinical frameworks (such as CFT, EST, and evolutionary models within CBT and psychiatry). The expression of "evolutionarily" rather than "evolutionary" is rooted in the idea of a psychotherapy informed by evolution rather than a specific field of evolutionary theory. Maybe I should clarify this point...

That said, I completely understand the need for clarity regarding the core subject. I am very happy to receive feedback and suggestions on how to make the prose as transparent and well-structured as possible. I am quite new in creating new Wiki pages, I'm trying to use my usual academic writing, trying to make it as understandable as possible.

Best

Terminy Terminy (talk) 05:40, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

You should do a better job at explaining what evolutionarily informed psychotherapy entails. Perhaps it can be explained better by comparing against other articles in Category:Psychotherapy by type. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:26, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Yes, thanks! I'm working on it! Terminy (talk) 09:52, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of Evolutionarily Informed Psychotherapy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evolutionarily Informed Psychotherapy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionarily Informed Psychotherapy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Simonm223 (talk) 13:26, 24 August 2026 (UTC)

Notice about a potential conflict of interest

Hello, Terminy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

• Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
• Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
• Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
• Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

This notice is being given because an unusually high share of your edits are related to the work of Simone Cheli. –Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 18:21, 25 August 2026 (UTC)