Tescotea

Welcome!

Hello, Tescotea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mars and Venus in the Bedroom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! PamD 14:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mars and Venus in the Bedroom

The article Mars and Venus in the Bedroom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 14:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mary Louise Kolanko

Hi, I'm Kmccook. Tescotea, thanks for creating Mary Louise Kolanko!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I really enjoyed reading this article. Please add categories and more references. Maybe you can upload a photo to Wikimedia commons. Would like an inline citation to the Hall of Fame reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Kmccook (talk) 23:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Sydney P. Freedberg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sydney P. Freedberg, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://talkingbiznews.com/1/bloomberg-hires-st-pete-times-reporter/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

DJ Cuppy

Hi! I noticed your post on the Femi Otedola talk page regarding a page for DJ Cuppy. I have actually prepared a draft for DJ Cuppy in my user space here. Would you mind taking a look at it and creating the article if you're satisfied with it as a starting point? Note my COI as per my user page. The article is fully referenced and completely neutral. Thanks. HOgilvy (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for the link to your draft-it was very helpful. I used a lot of your work, and have already placed the article here.Tescotea (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Hi – no problem, looks good. HOgilvy (talk) 09:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Doyle R. Simons

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Doyle R. Simons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert L. Wagman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert L. Wagman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert L. Wagman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 19:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jane Fonda's Workout Book

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jane Fonda's Workout Book, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JBchrch (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrew R. Lane

The article Andrew R. Lane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't meet WP:NBIO, sources are 1 passing mention, 1 salary website listing, and 2 biographical blurbs, 1 paragraph, seemingly written by his company so not independent coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Here2rewrite (talk) 23:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)