Gun Tables

edit

Yes I got the inspiration to do the gun tables from Mr. Gustin's site. Some of the data came from his site, but upon double checking the performance data I found that most of it was contradicted by other sources, so I removed the tables from the articles associated with each gun type. I also found that the majority of articles had no sources cited either and that the data in the tables conflicted with what was already listed. I think I have removed the tables from all of the articles, but if it isn't please alert me to the article and I will remove it!

Thank You --Idsnowdog (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wank juxtaposing

edit

Erm...actually, that was a mistake. I was trying to re-add the word "aid", but apparently I haven't a clue which was the proper edit to revert to. I thought you had reverted previously because you thought the aforementioned "aid" was vandalism. I had not read far enough down in the edit to notice the stupidness of the vandal. Actually, "powerful wank juxtaposing" is kind of a neat phrase, though I doubt it's really relevant to waiting for...what's his face... Cheers! --Yossarian   01:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)Reply


Block of User Textor

edit
 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

There has been some very intense abuse originating from this IP range, recently -- you had nothing to do with that, but unfortunately the IP addresses in here are very dynamic, so the only options are "block nothing" and "block everything." I've worked out a trial soft-blocking, provided that I'll be taking care of the damage that this unblock will probably cause. There's no perfect solution, here, but I didn't feel that sitting by and watching so many users blocked for things they had no part in would be appropriate. You should be able to edit, at this moment, but please do be wary of such blocks in the future -- I can't make any absolute promises, except that I'll do my best.

Thank you for your time and patience.

Best regards.

Request handled by: Luna Santin 10:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


January 2011

edit

  Please do not attack other editors, as you did at BK 37. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kubanczyk (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

What a sorry joke:
- first you reveal yourself as clueless on the technical aspect of the article you were editing
- then, when corrected, you sulk over it on the discussion page
- and now you are acting outraged virtue?
Just what the heck do you want: that everyone else has to ignore the facts you don't like?
Textor (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Textor. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Textor. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply