TG0000
Hello this is me Timothy. I haven't done much with this page. But that's because I spend most of my free time on my blogs or on social media. But you can also
- find out plenty about me through https://mewe.com/i/timothy_lgott
- or the somewhat obligatory http://www.facebook.com/timothy.gott
- contact me here http://gottmilk.wordpress.com/2008/12/16/contact-info/
- or http://timothy.gott.googlepages.com
I really enjoy knowlege and what wikipedia is doing though I am cautious of knowledge because for so many it can become more important than the Love that we should have for others.
Let me give you an example; Have you ever had someone scoff at you when you did not know something? or have you ever used the term or thought to yourself "He isn't very smart" or "He's rather stupid" or He's uneducated" or anything to that effect? Well that is what I mean about knowledge sometimes being more important than Love. If Love is the most important thing in your life then you would not be sitting here counting the number of times that I mispelled a word.
With that idea aside I really enjoy learning new things, but especially when it involves interacting with other people; sharing knowlege, learning and growning together.
... Timothy
Recent articles
editHey!
Just to let you know, if you're interested in articles that point to a correct article, just type "#REDIRECT [[Name of the article]]". Thanks! Linuxbeak (drop me a line) 18:50, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Broken redirect
editYou recently created the article Despidita, the entire content of which reads "#REDIRECT [[despidita]]". (You'd be surprised how often this happens!) I have been unable to figure out what article you were trying to redirect to; if you can correct this entry, please do. --Russ Blau (talk) 23:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Can you please tell me how to fix this if I do it in the future --Timothy Gott (talk) 14:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Free Bytes
editA {{prod}} template has been added to the article Free Bytes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Conscious 11:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
The article Free Bytes has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:58, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Greetings everyone. Free Bytes no longer exists however it has historical significance in regard to some of the early efforts to solve an electronics e-waste problem.
Can I access the deleted article and edit it to add this historical perspective? tg3793 (talk) 04:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of CottageMed
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on CottageMed, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dorama285 (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Tg3793. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 14:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Is there a way to find what I had written before. I have no relationship with CottageMed and simply thought it served as a fascinating Open-source/Nonprofit solution that would fit nicely alongside some of the other solutions listed here https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_health_software tg3793 (talk) 04:17, 15 June 2020 (UTC)