User talk:Thanoscar21/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Your thread has been archived

Hi Thanoscar21! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You probably get loads of questions about this, but I can't figure out how to archive my talk page..., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2048 (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2048 (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 23:21, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Regarding recent edit

Hello Thanoscar! Recently you did a rollback on an edit I did for The Buttertones' Wikipedia page and stated I did not source a reliable source. BrooklynVegan is the news outlet that reported on the original situation and I did cite it properly. It does have a copy of the instagram post that was publicly released by Clem from Cherry Glazerr but here is a link to her statement: https://www.instagram.com/p/CCqb8P3FJb5/ Would this be a considerably better source to use? The only mistake I made on the edit had to do with the date, I meant to write down July 15th, 2020 instead of April as this only happened a few days ago.

2601:280:4E00:2D80:4438:E42F:D841:A0C3 (talk) 22:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Moved to relevant talk page. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 22:44, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar!

It made my day, honestly. Thank you, thank you! TuskDeer (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

TuskDeer, no problem! Always better to have an extra pair of hands on deck when dealing with counter-vandalism! Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 00:21, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2048 (video game)

The article 2048 (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2048 (video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 16:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi, you rolled back an edit I made for not citing a reliable source. It was to the character list for a TV show which is an unsourced list of information. Not sure why you singled out that particular edit and not one of the other two I made. Interestingly you changed the unsourced, but slightly more accurate description I updated after watching the fifth episode of the series back to an earlier, unsourced, slightly less accurate version. Is it ok if we go with the more accurate version please?--86.31.190.41 (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

As a heads up; it appears to me that you're using rollback inappropriately on good faith edits rather than vandalism despite the instructions from User:Mz7 above. I have left them a message asking them to discuss this with you.--86.31.190.41 (talk) 22:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Moved to relevant talk page. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 23:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me how frustrating it can be trying to make wikipedia better. I quit a long time ago and it was a mistake to get drawn back in!--86.31.190.41 (talk) 23:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

I've clarified this in WP:REDWARN/A - rollback in RedWarn is the same as a normal revert as it adds an edit summary Ed6767 talk! 02:40, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

RL Thornton sources

Hi - you just left me a message saying I didn't use a reliable source to cite the information I referenced on the R.L. Thornton page. The D Magazine article I cited fits the wikipedia criteria so I don't understand your comment. Can you clarify. 76.183.236.229 (talk) 00:03, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Moved to relevant talk page — that's my bad, I forgot to see the history. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 21:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Talk page archive

I've not taken a conscious decision not to archive my talk page, it's just something I've never given thought to at all! For years there was very little traffic on it, so it never came to mind. You're right, though, it's something I should probably do since the page is getting rather long. Neiltonks (talk) 07:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Neiltonks, it's all a matter of personal preference. Thanks, Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 16:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Música Popular Brasileira

Chico Buarque don't have ANY famous song. Belchior is a LEGEND in Brazil, Buarque is a politician propagandist. 2804:14D:5C83:81A0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 23:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Moved to relevant talk page. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 23:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Chico Buarque is the biggest "music fake" of this world. This guy is NOT famous by his music, he is famous by politics. Belchior and others have really wonderful music, this guy is praised by the wrong motivation. 2804:14D:5C83:81A0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 23:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

The page don't have any source, so, I can change. No source traded by no source. 2804:14D:5C83:81A0:0:0:0:1 (talk) 23:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

It is sourced... but I honestly don't care anymore. Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 19:21, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2048 (video game)

The article 2048 (video game) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2048 (video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 16:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 August 2020

• Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?

• COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money

• News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin

• In the media: Dog days gone bad

• Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy

• Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom

• Traffic report: Now for something completely different

• Gallery: Photos of threatened species from iNaturalist

• News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users

• Recent research: Receiving thanks increases retention, but not the time contributed to Wikipedia

• Essay: Not compatible with a collaborative project

• Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil

• In focus: WikiLoop DoubleCheck, reviewing edits made easy

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

I see you recently accepted a pending change to April 29 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and backed this edit out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, it's not required but it sure would be helpful if you didn't accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.

Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 23:00, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Toddst1, thanks for telling me! I'll keep it in mind. Thanks, Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 16:43, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:CNN 10 concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CNN 10, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:17, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Apple Watch (sixth generation) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Apple Watch (sixth generation), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 03:42, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:CNN 10 concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CNN 10, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Rosseau (YouTuber) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rosseau (YouTuber), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apple Watch (sixth generation)

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apple Watch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:18, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rosseau (YouTuber)

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rosseau".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

• News and notes: The high road and the low road

• In the media: Storytelling large and small

• Featured content: Going for the goal

• Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way

• Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax

• Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics

• News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online

• Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles

• Arbitration report: A slow couple of months

• From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?

• Obituaries: Marcus Sherman, Jerome West, and Pauline van Till

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:CNN 10

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CNN 10".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 03:52, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Yasuko Endō

Hello and thank you for help with Yasuko Endō. I see you reverted the revert edit, but which part is unnecessary? I translate from the Japanese Wikipedia. Thank you Ficadimerda (talk) 12:33, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Ficadimerda, that was a misclick - I only saw that edit, and I've reverted my mistake. Thanks, Thanoscar21_{talk, contribs} 12:35, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

• Special report: Paid editing with political connections

• News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki

• In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later

• Featured content: Life finds a Way

• Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests

• Traffic report: Is there no justice?

• Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:48, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:One Plus 8

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "One Plus 8".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 21:51, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Braided Hair half cent moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Braided Hair half cent, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 00:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

• News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking

• In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books

• Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20

• Op-Ed: Anti-vandalism with masked IPs: the steps forward

• Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story

• Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.

• Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?

• Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner

• News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year

• Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters

• In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Once Upon a Virus... (Chinese propaganda)

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Once Upon a Virus...".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion about First Lady and Second Gentleman-designate titles in infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff

Please join a discussion here regarding whether the terms "First Lady of the United States Designate" and "Second Gentleman of the United States Designate" should be in the infoboxes of Jill Biden and Doug Emhoff, spouses of the president-elect and vice president-elect, respectively. We need to come to a consensus. Thank you for your participation. cookie monster (2020) 755 21:27, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

• News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"

• Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia

• Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia

• In the media: Relying on Wikipedia: voters, scientists, and a Canadian border guard

• Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria

• Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election

• News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker

• GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large

• Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup

• Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail

• Essay: Writing about women

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hurmaz

i just edit this search name is Hurmaz. please just verify these. RK Dawar (talk) 22:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

RK Dawar, Wikipedia is a volunteer-driven project. Nobody can claim authorship of one article. Is the IP you signed out? Also, the image is not a great one; there's a huge RK with a caption "This is my village". Regarding the message, I'm not too sure what you mean. Can you clarify? Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_contribs 14:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Beau Biden

This edit was definitely trolling. I don't think it was mixing up Beau with Hunter, though, it was probably about this. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Muboshgu, thanks for the heads up! Thanoscar21^talk_contribs 00:12, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

[Unexplained comment, heading added by me]

sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poqmlir (talk • contribs) 18:36, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Please sir help me create article

Sir when I go create article but create only draft not create a article page and not work sandbox Dhr90 (talk) 16:32, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sock. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:45, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:6G (network)

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "6G".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:33, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020

• News and notes: Year-end legal surprises cause concern, but Public Domain Day is imminent

• In the media: Concealment, data journalism, a non-pig farmer, and some Bluetick Hounds

• Arbitration report: 2020 election results

• Opinion: How to make your factory's safety and labor issues disappear

• Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.

• Traffic report: 2020 wraps up

• News from the WMF: What Wikipedia saw during election week in the U.S., and what we’re doing next

• Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions

• Essay: Subjective importance

• Op-Ed: An unforgettable year we might wish to forget

• Gallery: Angels in the architecture

• Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

CVUA admission request

Hi, Thanoscar21, hope that you'd be fine and safe. I was here to request you that can you accept me as your pupil at CVUA. I may be your first pupil if you agree. Thank you. Empire AS ^Talk! 12:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Empire AS, hi! I seem to remember seeing you at Puddleglum's page a few months ago. Can you link the previous CVUA page? It's so I don't repeat things you already know. One more thing: I'll mainly be using RedWarn. It's basically the same as Twinkle, but with bigger icons. Twinkle will mainly be used for WP:CSD. I'll set up your page later today; I look forward to working with you! Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 18:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Yes I was being trained by PG2 for nearly a month but he/she is missing since September 2020. May be, they forgot their password or due to any other reason, they aren't back. My training page is User:Puddleglum2.0/cvua/Empire AS. But I want to know how did you know that I was already trained by Puddleglum2.0? I was thinking that you don't know this. However, I'm ready to start. Am I your first pupil? Another request is that can you give me more work and task to perform? May be 2X or 3X or even more? Thank you. Empire AS ^Talk! 18:27, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Empire AS, Puddleglum was my CVUA trainer, so I used to pop in their TP to ask questions/whatnot from time to time. About the work, you're about halfway done with the course so far, so more work would happen if we each answer each other's pings quickly. I'm usually on Wikipedia every day, so you'll have more to work on. Unfortunately, the syllabus is the same, so when the course is done, you can patrol recent changes. I've pinged you at the page, and I'm starting where you left off (CSD examples). Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:19, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Li Wenliang

A tag has been placed on Dr. Li Wenliang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Superfluous. We have thousands of articles about people with degrees, and none of them has such a redirect, or should have.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hob Gadling (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For all your hard work to fight against vandalism and also completing my CVUA training. Keep it up. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 19:05, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Empire AS, thank you very much! Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 21:22, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Dick Kulpa

I’ve been trying to add the death of my friend Dick Kulpa. There isn’t an obituary yet, and no one has access to his personal site but him.

Thank you Markjvanwoert (talk) 13:25, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Markjvanwoert, if Dick Kulpa died there would be at least one reliable source stating his death. If you can find a source, then I have no problems with adding his death; it's just that Wikipedia has an extremely strict policy regarding biographies of living people. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:37, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Helping as a trainer in CVUA

Hello Thanoscar, I see that you're a trainer at CVUA. I was wondering if I could help out there, given that most of my time on Wikipedia is spent reverting vandalism (mainly through the abuselog, sometimes through recent changes). I couldn't find a list of 'requirements' on the actual CVUA page, so I'm asking here - I hope that's alright with you. Thanks, Pahunkat (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Pahunkat, there's no real set of rules. It's just whether you have the time and the experience to train others. You've been here longer than I have and have more edits than I, so I really don't see why not. The CVUA program doesn't include the abuselog, just a heads up. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Pahunkat, oh, and I forgot: you can see my template here. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 15:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice Thanoscar! I'm guessing these templates are open-source and trainers can make their own versions based on these? Pahunkat (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Pahunkat, yeah, I based this off of my own training page, and modified it to make RedWarn the primary tool. Feel free to add whatever you want to that. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Yep, finished my template now, it's mostly based off yours. See here. Adding myself to the list now :-) Pahunkat (talk) 18:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Letterkenny Problems

I have been updating the Letterkenny characters page with new characters and info. The introduction has a very long summary of who joined the main cast at which times which doesn't seem necessary and is covered in the table below. I wrote this in my edit summary. Is there a good reason for this paragraph to exist? Without reading the rest of the article, it means nothing. Specialsam110 (talk) 15:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Specialsam110, I haven't made an edit on that page, so I think you've got the wrong person. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:06, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

CVU/A request thing

I am quite well-versed in the field of counter-vandalism myself, but I would like to participate in CVU/A in order to further immerse myself in that realm. Also, RedWarn is amazing. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 20:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

JJPMaster, I'd be glad to! I've pinged you there. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 20:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Lang Leav (Criticism Section Revision)

This section is not entirely accurate and is more opinion based rather than being objective. It does not include any of the positive critique from numerous world renowned and recognised media publications and focuses mainly only on a negative narrative. From sources that have doubtful academic or journalistic credentials. If this is to be an honest, balanced and a fair interpretation, this section needs revision or to be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.72.49.254 (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia won't whitewash articles. All people have criticism. The Style and Inspiration section is sickeningly promotional sounding. Everybody has criticism at them, and just because you don't like it is no reason for you to remove the section. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:51, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:IPhone (2020)

Hello, Thanoscar21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "IPhone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

CVU/A Training request

Hi Thanoscar21, I would like to be one of your trainees for CVU/A because I am looking to be a trainer myself and I think that doing the CVU/A course would be a very helpful resource. Thanks, (eggybonk! (contribs)) 16:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC))

Eggybonk11, I'd be glad to! I've pinged you at the training page. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanoscar21, ok! eggybonk! (contribs)) 18:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Optional RfA candidate poll

As noted in the instructions, the poll is intended solely for those who intend to file a request for administrative privileges in the near future. It becomes highly speculative to provide feedback on your chances beyond that. As suggested in the instructions, you would be better served finding a friendly, experienced editor to give you feedback. isaacl (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Isaacl, all right, thanks for the advice. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:50, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing group looking to learn about Counter-Vandalism

Hello! I am a member of a group that has been learning together how to edit, basically through an ongoing edit-a-thon that meets once a week. We are relatively new Wikipedians (about six of us, who are librarians, teachers, physicists, and graphic designers with an average of about four months of editing experience each). We have a consensus that we would like to learn more about counter-vandalism as a way many of us might like to participate in doing the work going forward. Since you are in the same range of time zones as ourselves (we live spread across the continental US), we wondered if you might be willing to join us one week (by Zoom, chat, or other function) to talk to us about this type of work? Ultimately, it is likely that one or two of us may sign up for the academy and then share skills with the rest of the group. Thank you, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Oughtta Be Otters, you can ask me any questions right here on this talk page! I'm a little bit confused; so, you'd just like me to train you at the CVUA? As for the Zoom, any of you can just ask questions here; I like to have a record of things and for the purposes of transparency. I'd be glad to train you for the academy, and looking through your contribs, you have done much to help this encyclopedia, and thank you for your efforts. I'll create the training page once you'll clarify a bit, and I'm looking forward to the next few weeks of training you! Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:50, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanoscar21, thank you for your response. I realize my original request was a little unorthodox, and suspect it would have just led to me requesting an opportunity to be trained. Thus, if you are still willing, I would be really grateful to kick off the training process. Gratefully, Oughtta Be Otters (talk) 10:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Oughtta Be Otters, all right! I've pinged you at the talk page, let me know if it didn't pass through. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Biden

Apparently a 'new' editor has chosen to change your lead idea at Joe Biden & refuses to undo his bold version :( GoodDay (talk) 02:56, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

GoodDay, I'm assuming you mean the version that seemed to have consensus? I'm pretty sure Prinsgezinde violated the BRD rule, as pinned on the TP. I changed it back to the consensus-ed (if that's a word) version. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Draft:Channing Diaz

Hello Thanoscar21. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Channing Diaz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a test page. Thank you. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Passengerpigeon, can you tell me what you'd tag it as, if you'd tag it at all? I'm trying not to assume a combative tone, more of a curious tone. I tagged it as G2 because:

• It's 99% the kid making a page about himself
• Doesn't belong at Wikipedia
• He said that he was 10, so he's probably just seeing if he can make a page.

Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

As much as I'd like to nuke pages like this, it simply doesn't meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion; A7 (non-notable) only applies to published articles, not drafts, and G2 only applies where the content appears to be a test and contains no usable information (such as "Bold textItalic textuebfyyiywhidbfhvweyqvfiyVF4"). We will just have to wait six months for it to be deleted under G13. Passengerpigeon (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Passengerpigeon: I see now, thanks for replying. I've also formatted your reply, hope you don't mind. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:33, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

I want to join CVU

I Want to join CVU . Please admit me Jogesh 69 (talk) 17:09, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Jogesh 69

Jogesh 69, you have a request over here, so maybe wait for for that to be answered? Also, a quarter of your own edits have been to your own userpage; you only have 91 edits in the namespace. You've also been warned multiple times on your talk page to stop doing certain things, yet you continue to do them. As of right now, I don't see how you would benefit from a CVUA training, maybe you can come back after two to three months? Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2048 (video game)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2048 (video game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 17:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

You're just another Trump-licker

Are you proud of yourself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.18.67 (talk) 18:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

No, I'm anti-Trump, but I'm proud of myself for reverting an edit that insulted the members of an entire TP. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 20:42, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanoscar21, TP as in talk page? JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 23:04, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

JJPMaster, yep. Here's the diff. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:10, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2048 (video game)

The article 2048 (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2048 (video game) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 12:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2048 (video game)

The article 2048 (video game) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:2048 (video game) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Legobot messed up; it passed here. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 15:52, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

About my edit summary

I didn't think Wikipedians would be so anti-fun as to consider a tongue-in-cheek summary of a perfectly legitimate and informative edit vandalism. Maybe I overestimated this site's sense of humor. —GreenWeasel11 (talk) 16:25, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

GreenWeasel11, I understand the joke, and I laughed at the joke, but Wikipedia's edit filter might have filtered it out. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 16:28, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@GreenWeasel11: Fix ping. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 16:29, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

So the real problem here is that vandalism-detecting bots aren't programmed to understand jokes. Anyway, any human should be able to agree that I'm protected by the sentence "Even if misguided, willfully against consensus, or disruptive, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." —GreenWeasel11 (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

​That's true, but ClueBot NG can't really understand the difference between good faith and vandalism. You won't get in trouble (because bots aren't perfect, obviously), but there will be a message on your talk page. Just curious, are you on WSB? Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 16:39, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

I am indeed (as of yesterday; I'm a bandwagoner), with the same username, which may be unwise. —GreenWeasel11 (talk) 17:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Cool. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:32, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

CVU Student request.

Hi, I am WeißFocusRS, a new-ish user that is very interested in helping the wiki, I read that you are a previous academy graduate. I would like to learn how to counter vandals, and you seem like a good trainer. I am using Central Standard Time, so let's see if this will work out. :D PS: I have been blocked before due to an edit, but I did manage to get myself unblocked. I was sincerely sorry about that one, and I want to make up for it by helping the CVU.WeißFocusRS (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

WeißFocusRS, hi! I see you only have 17 edits in the mainspace; the recommendation in the CVUA page is to have 200. You can check your count here. If you'll come back maybe after a month or two, then I'd be glad to accept. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:13, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Thank you, it is very much appreciated, I will come back after that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WeißFocusRS (talk • contribs) 17:56, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2021

• News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021

• Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection

• In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades

• Opinion: Wikipedia's war against scientific disinformation

• In the media: The world's press says "Happy Birthday!" with a few twists

• Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically

• Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years

• News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world

• Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers

• Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia

• Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020

• Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

CVUA (Counter Vandalism Unit Academy) Student Admission Request

Hi, Thanoscar21. I am Iloveguppy, a new user in Wikipedia. I have recently been interested in becoming a member of the counter vandalism unit and noticed that you are a trainer for CVUA. Wonder if you could accept me as one of your students.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Iloveguppy 07:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Iloveguppy, hi! On the CVUA page, it says that around 200 edits in the mainspace are necessary, and you have less than 15. You can check your edit count here. If you'll come back with a bit more experience and after a couple of months, I'd be glad to accept you. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 Oh ok, I will see you when I hit 200 edits then :)

 Best regards

 Iloveguppy 01:17, 1st February 2021(UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Administrator changes

Hog Farm

Mattflaschen • Nandesuka • Savidan • Wangi

CheckUser changes

Berean Hunter • Xeno

Oversight changes

Someguy1221 • Xeno

Arbitration

• The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people, replacing the 1932 cutoff.

Miscellaneous

• Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
• Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

CVUA Academy Request

Hi, I am a new user interested in Counter Vandalism, and noticed that you are a trainer for CVUA. I was wondering if you would be willing to train me.

Thanks for your time!

WikiWolf7 (talk) 01:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiWolf7, I'd be glad to! I've started you page and pinged you there. Let me know if you didn't get it, and I'll ping you again. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 14:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you train me in WP:CVUA?

Hello, can you please train me on WP:CVUA to learn about the use of the counter vandalism tools on Wikipedia? Thanks. Rodney Araujo Tell me - My contributions 23:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Rodney Araujo, sure! I've pinged you at your page. Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Looking to join the CVU and be trained

I know you are probably busy but could you reach out to me as soon as possible about training? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starman2377 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Starman2377, I'd be glad to! I've pinged you there. Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

CVUA

Hello! I'm interested in joining the CVUA, would you accept me as a student? MEisSCAMMER^(talk) 22:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

MEisSCAMMER, sorry, you only have 65 edits, and over a third of those are to your own userpage. The minimum is around 200 edits in the mainspace. I can't accept you at this moment, but could you come back in a few months? Thanks, Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 22:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
OK, sorry, I'll come back later.MEisSCAMMER^(talk) 22:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Gridiron in the UK 🇬🇧

I started watching Ch4 coverage of the NFL in 1980 and followed it for a number of years. I remember a game played in Brighton around 1982-4 that I took my young boys to see. There doesn't seem to be any record of the game. Did I dream it? Johnny Marzola (talk) 17:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Johnny Marzola, I'm not sure what you mean by that. Can you please clarify? Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 21:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

not reliable sources

I can't remove misleading information just because it is sourced? And how do you deal with sources that is spreading false information with malicious intent? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randmlymee (talk • contribs) 22:30, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Randmlymee, can you please tell me how it's misleading? Please, don't try to whitewash information of an article. Everything has two sides, and at Wikipedia, we must cover both sides. Those sources; as far as I could see, they don't have any malicious intent, but I've tagged it with . Thanoscar21^talk_{contributions} 23:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)