That132IP
November 2011
edit
Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.
If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
I removed an editor's wish to bomb an American military base because one of its computers was being used to edit WP.
I'm not usually offended by anything and support a no-cencure policy. I understand the 3rr rule. The rule doesn't apply to content that violates WP:PA and WP:NICE. That132IP (talk) 03:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lutrinae (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. |