The1stEditor

Welcome!

Hello, The1stEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Zagalejo^^^ 06:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Zagalejo^^^ 06:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't really care if you use footnotes, as long as you at least use the edit summary to explain where your info comes from. Zagalejo^^^ 06:02, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Brockman and Johnson

Is there a source that says they were waived? I don't see anything. Zagalejo^^^ 03:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Spinnin' Records

It is not that you can list each and every artist that you think is notable. Unfortunately, WP:LISTPEOPLE demands that they should have articles first. Notability has to be proven and the easiest way is by having an article. The Banner talk 20:23, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response. Sorry about adding all those artists; I wasn't aware of the WP:LISTPEOPLE notability requirement. To explain, I, being a fan of Spinning Records, added them because I finally was able to find a recent link regarding the artists signed to them, something I had been looking for a long time (the DJ Mag ADE one). Still, I believe you are right about there being too many un-notable artists among those I listed. Do you think though, that maybe I can add certain artists back; namely, those who have had Beatport #1 tracks being the lead artists on those tracks: Dubvision [Backlash (Martin Garrix Edit)] and KSHMR [Burn (Original Mix)]? I feel, with these accomplishments, that they are certainly notable artists who would seem notable enough to put on the list, despite not having articles. The1stEditor 20:49, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Not without their own article. The Banner talk 21:18, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

DJ Magazine

added links pointing to Kura, Zedd, Wolfpack, Chuckie, Marlo, Adaro, Above & Beyond, Nervo, Carnage, Simon Patterson, TJR and John O'Callaghan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! The1stEditor, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Missvain (talk) 03:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DJ Magazine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Omnia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicetone (December 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktr101 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vicetone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:58, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DubVision has been accepted

DubVision, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 21:23, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vicetone (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CraigyDavi was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vicetone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—CraigyDavi (T∙C∙@) 17:03, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)