TheAudioArtistSubmiter
Nomination of Dj Matt Black for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dj Matt Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj Matt Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 03:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Dj Matt Black. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 04:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello there, The article will be re-written and press iteams will be added soon kinds regards, AAS TheAudioArtistSubmiter (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vito Glazers
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vito Glazers, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. John from Idegon (talk) 07:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
edit Hello TheAudioArtistSubmiter. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TheAudioArtistSubmiter. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheAudioArtistSubmiter|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. John from Idegon (talk) 07:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
No i am not receiving or have received a payment for the edits i have made, im doing this out of good will to help wiki grow, whats with the targeting today? TheAudioArtistSubmiter (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Well, please stop anyway. You've created a new category, Category:Music in the Borough of Wiltshire, which is a place that does not exist. There is already an existing category, Category:Musicians from Wiltshire, which appears on most of the articles you are editing. A quick check of your edits indicates most, if not all, will need to be undone. What are we missing here? Risker (talk) 23:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
borough of Wiltshire / county of Wiltshire, yes you may just say wiltshire but don't you think it deserves an actual title? a town or district which is an administrative unit (district can be called county or borough)[1] [2] TheAudioArtistSubmiter (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- No. Wiltshire is the name of the location, and it is a county, not a borough. The "title" as you call it is not something that is important in the English Wikipedia categorization scheme, and certainly "borough" would be the wrong one regardless. Just as importantly, in many cases there is no evidence that the performers you had categorized were focused on performing music *in* Wiltshire. The category that is appropriate is Category:Musicians from Wiltshire because these people are from Wiltshire. The category you created *might* conceivably be associated with (example only) a music festival in Wiltshire, or a group such as a symphony that is based in Wiltshire and promotes itself as being from Wiltshire. It is rare that brand new editors will have a good grasp of the (somewhat) complicated categorization system. It is okay to leave that to more experienced editors. Risker (talk) 01:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vito Glazers
edit If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vito Glazers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. John from Idegon (talk) 18:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising. John from Idegon (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Vito Glazers
edit
Hello, TheAudioArtistSubmiter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vito Glazers".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 10:29, 12 July 2019 (UTC)