TheEngineofProvidence

Welcome!

Hello, TheEngineofProvidence, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Age of Enlightenment, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for Organizations

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can . You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorials
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for you kind help but there no advertising, I can only you mean the link to a book from which I've sourced information it's actually a public domain free for all and none of the book are copyright. In this case it's Thomas Bostons book the crook in the lots I chose to source them specifically so it wasn't any sort of advert, what should do to remedy the situation. Talk to me like a human being here and be reasonable because I feel good about that I've shared I want to make it better though so we can learn of move forward together thanks and it also seems I'm competing with 3 people can we lose the other two and fix this issue together or no? TheEngineofProvidence (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Age of Enlightenment. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:56, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

User:WikiDan61 is the other person I'll send him your info and we'll work all this out quickly and positively. I'm going to perhaps suggest we could all talk in the tea house or something publicly so we can figure out what to do I can make work I'm sure of that much and I'm pretty confident that I didn't do either od thing you think I've done and if I did I've got alternative sources for the book I just thought public domain free for all none copyrights place would be more appropriate link to source the book which I spoke of apparently some ones it's my personal opinion not that of say google books or universities like Edinburgh or Glasgow or many others so we source it but need to no what you want sourced before you two go all crazy thinking I'm destructive I've not edit anybody's work only added my own I feel good we can fix this. TheEngineofProvidence (talk) 14:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Isaac Newton are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. StephenMacky1 (talk) 15:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Opinions

In this edit to Age of Enlightenment, you have added a fair amount of material that reflects your personal opinion about the subject. Wikipedia's neutrality policy demands that we keep our own opinions out of our Wikipedia writing, but rather rely on what reliable sources have said. In quoting Newton and Fichte directly, without benefit of what published scholars have said about these writers, you are engaging in original research, which Wikipedia also discourages. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

I don't believe I have gave my own opinion perhaps I need more sources so you can understand however I'm already one person on this issue I can't be dealing with 10 people so is it you or him I'm to deal with just want deal with one person. To eliminate confusion.

But out of curiosity what is my personal view I'm always willing improve though I think I've used I was careful to remove any of my views when I edited it for typos there was few I thinks I deleted before I published. I'll get the name of the other person I'm dealing so we can work that out first. TheEngineofProvidence (talk) 14:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

User:tgeorgescu is the other person I'll send him your info and we'll work all this out quickly and positively. TheEngineofProvidence (talk) 14:06, 30 May 2023 (UTC)