Hello/Salaam/Shalom/Bonjour/Hola/Nihao/Konichiwa/Jambo!

edit

I don't edit too many articles, I prefer to read them. When I do edit, and when you disagree with it, don't ask me about it here, aiight? keep it to the talk page, unless you feel it's unrelated. Go forth and edit! PerfectGentleman (talk) 03:12, 7 November 2011 (UTC)Reply


Welcome and introduction

edit

Hi, TheLittlestTerrorist. This is NOT some automated message...it's from a real person. You can talk to me right now. Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed you've just joined, and wanted to give you a few tips to get you started. If you have any questions, please talk to us. The tips below should help you to get started. Best of luck!  Chzz  ►  01:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
ようこそ
  • You don't need to read anything - anybody can edit; just go to an article and edit it. Be Bold, but please don't put silly stuff in - it will be removed very quickly, and will annoy people.
  • Ask for help. Talk to us live, or edit this page, put {{helpme}} and describe what help you need. Someone will reply very quickly - usually within a few minutes.
  • Edit existing articles, before you make your own. Look at some subjects that you know about, and see if you can make them a bit better. For example, Wikipedia:Cleanup.
  • When you're ready, read about Your first article. It should be about something well-known, and it will need references.

Good luck with editing; please drop me a line some time on my own talk page.

There's lots of information below. Once again, welcome to the fantastic world of Wikipedia!

-- Chzz  ►  01:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:45, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Creation Science article

edit

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. In this edit, I've revised some material which you added to the Creation Science article. Since your user page makes a point of saying that you are religious, and the changes bear on a point of religious belief, I wanted to notify you individually of the changes I've made. I cited a supporting source for my changes, but if WP:DUE considerations apply, feel free to add mention of significant differing viewpoints supported by other sources of similar prominence and reliability. Cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Username concern

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (TheLittlestTerrorist) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it uses the string "Terrorist", which may be discomfiting to other editors. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I disagree heartily. The word terrorist is not offensive, it simply a characteristic. It's not as if I mention a group of people or a person! I chose that username because it contrasts something cute "The littlest" with something that is not, "terrorist". I really see nothing to be offended about. I make no claims about no one. P.S. - I am a terrorist in the sense of "blowing minds". Thank you, though, for pointing this out. TheLittlestTerrorist (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I understand. However in an instance like this I think the community should be persuaded. Would you mind if I submit this for a username request for comment? You're free to participate, but if the consensus is to disallow it, you have to either put in for a change or the account will be blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I would prefer you did not. My username is not offensive, and since I opnly started I do not know enough about wikipedia processes to present my case or what policies are on my side. If you really want to block me because of a percieved slight, go right ahead, but I contest this. 'Terrorist' is not a dirty word, especially not when it's a a username referring to oneslelf. It really is unfair that obscure policies and blocks are used against someone so new. Thanks for the welcome... TheLittlestTerrorist (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • I have (at this point in time) absolutely zero concerns as to this editor. But I do agree with Case -- this is a slippery slope, and one I think we would be best off avoiding. IMHO, of course. No personal offense intended.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
So should we go to RFC, then? Note to user: you wouldn't have to really know much about policy, although if you want to bone up it's here. I understand if you find it frustrating, but when you create your account there is a notice on the page that this policy exists and is enforced. Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
While I don't wish to cause the user upset, I do think that is the better course, given the wider implications.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sigh. After reading your comments, I reluctanttly aquiece, since I respect Epeefleeche as one of the best editors in Wikipedia. Is it possible to havee a grace period of 5 days? I want to come up with a better name, which I promise will be PC. TheLittlestTerrorist (talk) 18:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Request submitted. TheLittlestTerrorist (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sure. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Personally, I thought the username as phrased is kind of cute and non-threatening with its juxtaposition of two words that evoke opposite reactions. Sort of like "Violent Snail" or "Gentle Ogre". I see no problem with this name. I don't see it as a slippery slope either. We make exceptions on a case-by-case basis. We've done that now and then with usernames ending in "bot" (like "I, Robot") and we can do it here.

My recommendation is to keep your name. If anybody really objects, let an RfC take place. You will be informed of where it is so you can participate. Then change your username if community consensus favors you changing it, otherwise let it be. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the support :), but I already submitted the request for change name. I suppose after I gain a reputation as an honest editor on wikipedia I could see about changing it back in the future, but for now I intend to stand by my word. Have a great weekend! TheLittlestTerrorist (talk) 23:52, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hmm the menu still reads 'TheLittlestTerrorist' but the title of ,y use page reads 'PerfectGentleman'... thoughts? TheLittlestTerrorist (talk) 03:28, 5 November 2011 (UTC) Or not! logout login fixed it!PerfectGentleman (talk) 03:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)Reply