User talk:TheMagikCow/archive1

TheMagikCow, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheMagikCow! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks mate, for the nice words on my creation of the article on Susanne Hoeber Rudolph.--jojo@nthony (talk) 15:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Famous Jury Trials (radio program)

Thanks for your note. You asked, "Can there be more links to and from this page?" Yes, there will be. In fact, I had just begun adding links when I saw notification of your message. I plan to add as many as possible today. I appreciate your interest. Eddie Blick (talk) 15:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Banco (Sir Michael Rocks album)

They are quotes from the artist in question, how are they gibberish? I can trim them, but just don't blindy tag it for deletion. Koala15 (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Are they relevant though?

I questioned adding them myself, but they seem like very informative quotes about each song. Koala15 (talk) 18:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Your Username

I know this is random, but coming across your edits, I had to say. I love your username! If you need any help learning your way around here, {{ping|Solarra}} and I'll do what I can to help out. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 18:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much!TheMagikCow (talk) 18:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Henrique Bernardelli

You say that you're proposing to delete Henrique Bernadelli because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. Bit quick there: I'd more or less only just pressed the save button! Anyway, Bernadelli isn't a living person, he has been dead for nearly 80 years! It does need references (it doesn't have them in the original Portuguese Wiki) and I tagged it as such. Bagunceiro (talk) 18:28, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Sheik Umar Khan Issues

Hi, TheMagikCow.

The article (Sheik Umar Khan) is (at this point) just an introductory stub, so for now it is still an orphan.

I am unclear as to why the neutrality is disputed--I wrote that Khan "was recognized as a 'national hero' by Sierra Leone's Health Ministry"--but made no claims myself as to whether their assessment as quoted is accurate.

I'm going to remove the Neutrality tag but leave (until more links are established) the Orphan tag; please do let me know if you believe this is inappropriate.

Thanks for your contribution.

Jtropp1 (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Stubs

Hallo, Please take care not to add {{stub}} to an article like Ivan Petrović (footballer born 1986) which already has a specific stub template. Thanks. PamD 09:26, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Church of Google (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Church of Google.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:06, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith White-Hunt

Regarding your prod of this article, while I endorse it, I also want to ask you to follow best practices in the future. Which is: notify the author ([1]), add templates showing problems with the article so that newbies like that author can more easily understand the issues ([2]) and add relevant templates to article's talk (Talk:Keith White-Hunt) so that it appears on appropriate deletion listing / article alerts at WikiProjects. Thanks! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

I want my bixnood back

https://ylilauta.org/int/31666495

Thanks for your review

On Matilda Cullen Knowles - appreciated :) Leela0808 (talk) 16:56, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Badnapur (Vidhan Sabha constituency)

Hello TheMagikCow. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Badnapur (Vidhan Sabha constituency), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The text from the other article was being used as a template. The current version of the article is not a copy of the other page. Thank you. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Victor Margolin Issues

Hi TheMagikCow,

Thank you for your note about this article (Victor Margolin). I'm new to Wikipedia, so although I think I have updated the article to include the references how you wanted them I'm not entirely sure. Would you mind taking a look and letting me know if there is anything else I need to update?

Also, if you are happy, could you let me know how to remove your tag?

Thanks,

AbbieBlooms

Motivated edits in Happy New Year (2014 film)

Hi TheMagikCow - I have noticed that a user User talk:Armaan.haider repeatedly removing content critical of movie Happy New Year (2014 film) without providing any reasons. I have checked the users talk page and it seems user has a habit of doing so repeatedly and there are couple of warnings on his talk page where fellow editors have advised him to restrain from such practice. I would urge to have a look into the issue. I had added the criticism and controversy part of the movie citing verifiable reference. I think since the user is repeatedly engaging in such activities his/her's edit access should be revoked. Vinod (talk) 12:46, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

New Page Patrol

Hi. We appreciate your enthusiasm, but with only 92 edits to mainspace it's most unlikely you already have sufficient experience to be patrolling new pages - it's a task that requires an almost admin level knowledge of deletion, copyright, conflicts of interest, and other special but hard to detect reasons for deletion. I would suggest you start with something much easier such as reverting vandalism. Check it out at the WP:CVU and if you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Happy editing! --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TheMagikCow. You have new messages at Kudpung's talk page.
Message added 01:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Niebla fimbriata

Hi TheMagikCow. You "reviewed" the above new article, and left a note on its creator's talk page letting them know that. I'd like to point out that i just found two very obvious errors ~ a broken template for one, which is hugely disruptive on a page and not really to be missed ~ which i have corrected. While we all appreciate your enthusiasm, i would second what Kudpung points out above, and think that you should maybe consider stepping back from reviewing new pages for a while, and gain some experience in actually working on the project, so you understand a bit better what is and is not appropriate. Please, please understand that i am not ungrateful, nor do i wish to stop you, merely to help you to become a better editor. If i can help in any way, please ask on my talk page, or reply here. Cheers, Lindsay^Hello 11:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi TheMagikCow. By pure coincidence I have noticed that some of your own most recent edits are totally unsourced additions to articles. Obviously not every sentence in an article needs to be sourced but major claims that appear to have been taken from other sources, news articles, or the Lord Mayor of London, must be sourced otherwise they will be removed quicker than the twinkling of an eye. This clearly demonstrates that you do not (yet) have the knowledge to be patrolling pages. We have rather a lot of pages on our policies (a few hundred actually) but obviously no one can expect every editor to know them all off by heart after just a few weeks. Do what you can, take it slowly, and one day you'll be surprised how much you have learned. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2014 (UTC)