TheMovieMan222
|
May 2012
editThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to 2012 in film does not have an edit summary. It is particularly important to include a summary when deleting text to ensure no one mistakes you for a vandal. Thank you. --Wavehunter (talk) 21:58, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
The article 2013 and beyond in film has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for your continuous work updating the 2013 and beyond in film article. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:47, 24 July 2012 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for October 21
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luis Prieto (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:12, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 and beyond in film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Horror and Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 4
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 and beyond in film, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Action and Kevin Hart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 and beyond in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 19
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2012 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to National Geographic
- 2013 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Horror
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2012 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Romance
- 2013 in film (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Patrick Wilson
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Hey, man. I'm Battleship.
I want to know if you do agree with the argument on talks on talk sections World View and Worldwide view, because the way I see it, they just frustrated many readers by deleting the links of List of 2012 box office number-one films in the United States and List of 2012 box office number-one films in the United Kingdom from that article and set up Lists of box office number-one films, which it only carries all box-office films in each country in different years and you'll have to scroll down to UK and US in order to get 2012 box office film in those countries and I don't agree with this because it would frustrate many readers by doing all that.
We got to find a way to reach a compromise on this issue, so we won't have to deal with all of this argument over this. BattleshipMan (talk) 17:59, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
I agree with you, however that's honestly not my biggest issue with the whole "world view" issue on the page, so I can support you there but it's not something I truly care about when it comes to the page. Thanks for bringing it to my attention for sure.
Thanks,
MovieMan222 TheMovieMan222 (talk) 23:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- I know this arguement isn't your biggest issue. But I just edited a new post about this argument. Please support me on this when you can. BattleshipMan (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 5
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 and beyond in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Levy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)