Ajaychadda99281

Welcome!

Hello, TheNewYorkTimesIN, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Dev Upreti, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dev Upreti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dev Upreti, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dev Upreti (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dev Upreti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, TheNewYorkTimesIN! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dev Upreti (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dev Upreti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TheNewYorkTimesIN/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:TheNewYorkTimesIN/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Annh07 (talk) 09:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Hello TheNewYorkTimesIN. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:TheNewYorkTimesIN. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheNewYorkTimesIN|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Draft:Dev Upreti, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:TheNewYorkTimesIN, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=TheNewYorkTimesIN|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll add it TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 09:57, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Sorry🙏 TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 09:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Please sir, help me to publish this article. TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Do you work for the New York Times? What is your relationship with Dev Upreti? 331dot (talk) 10:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

No i don't work with new york time, I'm hired by Dev Upreti to write this article. TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 10:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Then you must immediately do two things; one, change your username(which I can do if you tell me what you want to change it to) and then once that is done, make the Terms of Use-required paid editing disclosure on your user page. 331dot (talk) 10:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Ohk sir, so you just put any name according to you. TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

I can't choose a username for you. You need to choose it. I can carry out the rename once you choose one, but you need to make the choice. 331dot (talk) 10:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Sir please put it - ajaychadda99281 TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 10:28, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

And please help me with other things to get this article published TheNewYorkTimesIN (talk) 10:29, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Okay, the rename is done. You now need to make the paid editing disclosure(see WP:PAID for instructions). 331dot (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

but sir i don't understand it...So can you do it form me..Pleasee i request to you Ajaychadda99281 (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

If you are being paid by Mr. Upreti to edit, it is up to you to learn about our policies and do the required work. I'm not being paid to be here. If you find the coding of the required disclosure too challenging, you may just write a statement on User:Ajaychadda99281 stating your paid relationship. 331dot (talk) 11:04, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Dev Upreti. If you are interested to know how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements already in Wikipedia – and, if possible, correct them. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with sanctions, which could include a block from editing. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dev Upreti (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dev Upreti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Dev Upreti

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Dev Upreti, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:33, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Who is Dev Upreti (Entrepreneur)? Story of Dev Upreti Wiki, Biography, Girlfriend, Parents, Kids, Net Worth, Age, Family, News & More (tatainfoforreal.blogspot.com) Ajaychadda99281 (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Sir, This are some websites which tells everything about him,

#1 Rolling Stone: The Rise and Rise of Dev Upreti (tatainfo.tk)

Dev Upreti's Cars collection worth ₹67 Cr | Dev Upreti's Net worth in 2021 (tatainfoforreal.blogspot.com) Ajaychadda99281 (talk) 10:44, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ajaychadda99281/sandbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Ajaychadda99281/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

It's ohk if you deleted it now....But keep in mind that in 2026 This article will get verified because....Something is waiting for 2026...Boooom...By Dev Upreti... He has not yet revealed all about him....But he is going to reveal in 2026.....Just Wait And Watch Ajaychadda99281 (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  331dot (talk) 11:56, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 12:59, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

I tried to help you, and you decided to swear at me instead of addressing our concerns. Talk page access removed. 331dot (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)