Blocked for noncompliance with bot policy

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for operating of an unapproved bot in violation of WP:Bot policy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Since you indicated that the bot is running unattended, I am shutting the account down until you check in and comment on how you are bringing the account and bot into compliance with the bot policy. —C.Fred (talk) 00:21, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

September 2015

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TheReviewingOfficial654321 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not an unapproved bot. As the message on my user page says, this account is co-operated by a person and an off-Wikipedia robot. The automated robot does not have any connection to the Wikimedia Foundation in any way, shape, or form. It makes automated edits on other changeable websites as well. Note that the username does not contain the word "bot" for this reason. I am the reviewer (Boing! Bounce!) 19:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC) 00:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

See the explanation by C.Fred below. Huon (talk) 00:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TheReviewingOfficial654321 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Decline reason:

For the record, the block reason has been updated. It's now a CheckUser block. Huon (talk) 21:34, 20 September 2015 (UTC)Reply