TheRobbEllisonShow

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Star Trek has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. McSly (talk) 18:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

The article Porcelain youth has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Blink-182

No problem; I make mistakes too and it helps when they are left un-edited. Thank you for taking the time to follow up on the source that I deleted. Every little bit helps! Gyrferret (talk) 05:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Wooblz!

Perhaps Wooblz! just thinks Mark is more enigmatic of the band at this point.... that, or he likes him more than Tom.... the world may never know...Gyrferret™ 16:43, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Blink-182 lead

RobbEllisonShow, please stop the edit warring over the lead and discuss the issue at the talk page. Here at Wikipedia, we rely on consensus to resolve editing issues, and we look down upon edit warring, as it can become very disruptive to the encyclopedia. Each article's talk page exists so that these issues can be discussed; edit summaries are not good places to hold a discussion and their use as such just perpetuates the disruption caused by edit warring. Although you haven't technically broken the 3 revert rule, your long-term, repeated reverting is very disruptive and could result in a block for edit warring. Please do not reinsert your text until/unless consensus is reached at the talk page to do so. Timmeh 18:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Moneen and Korn are actual altered stylizations, not just a simple capital letter. It's a pointless line, besides just because it is that way on another page, does not mean it should be that way on this one. kiac. (talk-contrib) 03:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)