Hello, thank you for your message. You noted that I had removed material without proper explanation, which is certainly a mistake. You don't seem indicate where this was. It is quite possible that whatever I removed, I myself had written--although again explanation should be offered.ManfredHugh (talk)

October 2020

edit

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 14:23, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dead in The Water (novel) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dead in The Water (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dead in The Water (novel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paultalk11:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lenger Lines

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Lenger Lines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 19:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Stare Wars

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Stare Wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 18:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Need a help

edit

Hi. Thank You for being generous to put a message to my talk page. I have one request from you. I have a problem when uploading photographs of living persons. The photograph is not found anywhere in the internet. They are solely given to me by the copyright holder or the particular artist. But when I upload it through "fair use" tag, it has been deleted. So, can you help me to upload them correctly and fairly?? Cheers.. Gihan Jayaweera talk 23:25, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for operating a compromised account. I'm not sure how an external website can compromise a Wikipedia account, and if somehow this is not what happened as claimed by TheGoodMoleMan please appeal the block as indicated and it will be reviewed..
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Beeblebrox (talk) 01:34, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year!

edit

Gihan Jayaweera (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Game Hacking" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Game Hacking and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 13#Game Hacking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 20:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Dead in The Water.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Dead in The Water.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply