Past chats and rows

edit

User talk:The 5th Doctor/Storage 1 (before July 23, 2014)

Whipping Bоys

edit

Stop creating that redirect under any name. It is not appropriate unless the article discusses that the name is actually used to describe the team. If you create it again, I will block you. GB fan 22:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply


Oh, decided to talk at last did you rather than abusing your admin powers? First of all regarding the block, you just try it on my son, you'll come unstuck I promise. As for Whipping Boys, well let me tell you, how do you describe a team that got hammered 7-1 on their OWN soil? And then to top it off they come 4th after being hammered 3-0 by the Dutch, ten goals in two matches. The sort of thing you expect from San Marino except the latter don't go round making out they are the best. Facts: Germany and Holland thrashed the pants off Brazil and this makes Brazil the whipping boys and five hundred sources call them that name. The 5th Doctor (talk) 22:37, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Then get it added into the article and then create the redirect. The redirects without any information in the article is vandalism and will be treated as such. GB fan 22:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanx for telling me. I now understand the procedure. Won't do it again unsourced. Ta. The 5th Doctor (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Il Divo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  GILO   A&E 22:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me but can you explain yourself? You call it a band but it is a group because the boys play no instruments, so what's your problem? The 5th Doctor (talk) 22:55, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Chobert for deletion

edit

Hello The 5th Doctor, I thought you'd like to know I put Chobert up for deletion at Articles for Deletion. The discussion and my reasoning are at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chobert. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

That's fair enough, no problem with that route. The 5th Doctor (talk) 23:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit

A discussion is happening concerning you at WP:ANV -Roxy the dog (resonate) 15:54, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Although I'm not going to block you at the moment, your recent user talk postings have been fair from collegial. If you continue to act in this manner, then a block could be applied. PhilKnight (talk) 16:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chobert. RationalBlasphemist (Speak) 06:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Fuckthagay

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:Fuckthagay, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RationalBlasphemist (Speak) 06:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pumpkins

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:Pumpkins, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. RationalBlasphemist (Speak) 06:42, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

July 2014

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Hut 8.5 06:48, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply
I hope that was satisfying. You've just lost the right to edit this page. Hut 8.5 06:52, 25 July 2014 (UTC)Reply