User talk:The Banner/Archives/2024/October
This is an archive of past discussions about User:The Banner. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This user seems they do not want you editing on Wikipedia hence the name. They reverted your edits by removing references on the page but I have reverted them back. Jz0610 (talk) 05:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank, I will go to SPI over this. I have the strong impression that this is the alter ego of another user that I recently reverted the edits of. Exactly the same edits as my "fan" now performed. In fact, I had seen them already last night, but going to bed was more time sensitive then acting against this sockpuppet. The Banner talk 11:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
A user by the name of User:Bkkkul has added a lot of false information of routes at this airport article, can you restore the article to the last edit before his edit there? Because I don't know how to restore revisions, thanks Metrosfan (talk) 04:28, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
- All unsourced, so reverted. The Banner talk 10:07, 12 October 2024 (UTC)
Shannon
Hello there and thanks for adding that ref. for "Sionna" from logainm.ie. However, since that form is archaic and has not been passed down like the accepted name is it appropriate to move it out of the list of names and add it in merely as a footnote? In all my days, this is the first time I've ever come across "Sionna". All the best Billsmith60 (talk) 13:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Mariana and Palau Islands campaign
Hello, I saw that you removed my editing of adding flags on the commanders on a certain battle (I forgor its name but I’m sure you know it, it’s between Japan and the US), in almost every single article it has this, and tbh I don’t want to make a big deal out of this small issue, but I don’t see a problem with the flags if it’s literally used in every other article, and it’s a lot of commanders not one, so yep Tyiia (talk) 15:06, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
There is a IP address that have been adding "MY AirAsia" which is a non existent airline, he put the code of it as Z9 which is the flight code for the defunct MYAirline, I have reverted his edits twice and he still insists on adding it and now he added two more non existent airline, one was the old name of a cargo airline that had it's AOC revoked, the other one was just only under planning according to several sources on Google, Can you revert the edits by the IP? because it looks like they refuse to stop, and I don't want to get into a misunderstanding and get falsely accused of edit warring, thanks Metrosfan (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I checked them and removed all three one by one with an explanation. The Banner talk 12:58, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @The Banner thanks, you might wanna add it to your watchlist as they might re-add them Metrosfan (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have also asked some questions on his talkpage. If it persists, a semi-protection can be requested at WP:RPP. The Banner talk 13:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @The Banner this user has also made edits of some unsourced edits of Thai startup airlines launching new routes even though they haven't even began operations Metrosfan (talk) 15:10, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @The Banner update: another IP address have also re-added Ascent Airways Malaysia to the same article, I have reverted it, is this a sign of potential sockpuppetery? Metrosfan (talk) 09:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- It could be but it is very difficult to prove. The Banner talk 11:58, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have also asked some questions on his talkpage. If it persists, a semi-protection can be requested at WP:RPP. The Banner talk 13:12, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
- @The Banner thanks, you might wanna add it to your watchlist as they might re-add them Metrosfan (talk) 13:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Biased Moderation
Please could you stop making malicious edits and reverts on Church of Ireland related pages? You push a Roman Catholic POV, including sectarian and inflammatory language. You have told me this is because you see the Church of Ireland as unimportant. This is not acceptable. LODU70 (talk) 12:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for confirming your CoI-point of view. The Banner talk 12:25, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I do not have a CofI pov in my edits. I said it was unacceptable that you are making edits based on how subjectively important you regard the CofI to be. LODU70 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are just claiming things without any evidence, with a clear positive bias towards the CoI. The Banner talk 12:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could you provide an example of this please? LODU70 (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Pushing CoI up, based on related sources, POV, POV, unsourced. The Banner talk 13:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- As I have shown, including in the talk section, the see and bishopric of Glendalough has a much longer and continuous history than in the Roman Catholic Church. Glendalough remains a substantive diocese in the Church of Ireland.
- Why would the recently revived RC honorific come before the much older diocese itself? LODU70 (talk) 13:08, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- And here again you show your bias by claiming that the CoI-tradition is older then then the Catholic tradition. The Banner talk 13:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- No. If we take the Reformation as year 0, and assume for argument sake neither is older. The Church of Ireland has continued to use the title and maintained the diocese. But the RC church has not maintained the diocese, and had let the title drop- thereby necessitating a ‘revival’ in 1969. So the CoI diocese has a longer and more substantive use. LODU70 (talk) 13:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- And again you confirm your bias. The Banner talk 13:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You don’t seem capable of engaging in discussion, or defending your points, but just throwing accusations. LODU70 (talk) 13:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:NPA. Please, stop this. The Banner talk 13:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Again, you’re accusing me of something you’re doing. I’ve engaged in discussion, and you have made bald assertions. LODU70 (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You only started discussions after your POV was reverted. The Banner talk 14:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You’ve made lots of POV edits without discussion. LODU70 (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- And you felt the need to follow me around. The Banner talk 15:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- What’s sauce for the goose… LODU70 (talk) 15:48, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- And you felt the need to follow me around. The Banner talk 15:39, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You’ve made lots of POV edits without discussion. LODU70 (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You only started discussions after your POV was reverted. The Banner talk 14:13, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Again, you’re accusing me of something you’re doing. I’ve engaged in discussion, and you have made bald assertions. LODU70 (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- WP:NPA. Please, stop this. The Banner talk 13:33, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You don’t seem capable of engaging in discussion, or defending your points, but just throwing accusations. LODU70 (talk) 13:32, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- And again you confirm your bias. The Banner talk 13:30, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- No. If we take the Reformation as year 0, and assume for argument sake neither is older. The Church of Ireland has continued to use the title and maintained the diocese. But the RC church has not maintained the diocese, and had let the title drop- thereby necessitating a ‘revival’ in 1969. So the CoI diocese has a longer and more substantive use. LODU70 (talk) 13:27, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- And here again you show your bias by claiming that the CoI-tradition is older then then the Catholic tradition. The Banner talk 13:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Pushing CoI up, based on related sources, POV, POV, unsourced. The Banner talk 13:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Could you provide an example of this please? LODU70 (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- You are just claiming things without any evidence, with a clear positive bias towards the CoI. The Banner talk 12:49, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I do not have a CofI pov in my edits. I said it was unacceptable that you are making edits based on how subjectively important you regard the CofI to be. LODU70 (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Edits on Tenerife South Airport
Hi, could you please stop reverting my edits on Tenerife South Airport ? The route Tampere-Tenerife has been closed, they are no longer labelled as 'direct flight' on airBaltic's website. Only routes from Tenerife to Riga, Tallinn and Vilnius have 'direct flight' mark 90.131.39.229 (talk) 13:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have reverted your edit, as you created a big mess with that edit.
- I have removed the connection with Tampere by now, as you are correct in that. That was the downside of adding an unsuitable ( = non-independent) source to it.
- The Banner talk 14:06, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
You might wanna keep an eye on this user, after you reverted his edits at Astana Airport, this user has proceeded to repeat the disruptive edits at Bandaranaike International Airport and even redo the ones at Velana International Airport, please restore the previous revision before his edits, thanks, also a note: I have removed the start date of Air Arabia's Male flights resumption, please re-remove the date after you revert his edits, thanks. Metrosfan (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have issued warnings for unsourced edits. The Banner talk 12:40, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, I forgot to tell you that later on someone had already reverted the edits at Colombo Bandaranaike Airport before you Metrosfan (talk) 13:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- @The Banner this user have now once again went to repeat the same editting pattern on 4 other articles, he firstly did them on Suvarnabhumi Airport and Kuala Lumpur International Airport, right after they are reverted he continued to do the same at Warsaw Chopin Airport and Nursultan Nazarbayev International Airport, i have reverted the one at Warsaw Chopin, however i need you to restore the previous revision at Nursultan Nazarbayev International Airport, I think it is the time for ANI since he repeatedly continued what he is doing, there's also a high chance he might be a sockpuppet because his editing pattern is extremely similar to some other users that have previously done these edits before, I don't know who he exactly is a sockpuppet of, but he likely is one Metrosfan (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- I have reverted his edits and properly warned him on his talk page. The next time, you can file a report on WP:AIV (not AN/I). User is not communicating, so short blocks to get his attention is the way to go. The Banner talk 10:37, 28 October 2024 (UTC)