User talk:The Four Deuces/Archives/2016/January
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:The Four Deuces. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi there. I reverted your comment on the article's page, seemed like it would be better placed on the Talk page. Or did I miss something? Regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what What should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Personalizing and attributing motive
TFD, you have written several things, and are behaving in a way, that violates AGF. Things like this and this are completely out of line and are getting in the way of dealing with content in the Sanders article. Please stop doing that and deal with the actual content proposals. I don't even know what you mean about "discrediting Sanders". Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 17:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
I brought the issue to ARBCOM. That is the best place to discuss the it. TFD (talk) 21:42, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- weird. but OK off we go. Jytdog (talk) 21:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Tag Removal
I've clearly stated in Talk that my efforts to remove weasel words and add sourced content to Fiorina's bio have been reverted. If you do not restore the POV tag, I'm going to seek admin intervention.CFredkin (talk) 07:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- What part of the policy do you think the current wording violates? TFD (talk) 07:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Weasel words were restored and well-sourced content was removed.CFredkin (talk) 07:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- My question was, "What part of the policy do you think the current wording violates?" I suggest you read the policy before replying again. TFD (talk) 07:58, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Weasel words were restored and well-sourced content was removed.CFredkin (talk) 07:52, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Notice of ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.CFredkin (talk) 08:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)