The Kasparov of Sheshbesh
| Welcome!
Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing! If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page! Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages: Best of luck to you, and happy editing! |
Article
editSorry to add this, but An editor has nominated the article Jew Year's Eve for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jew Year's Eve. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Jew Year's Eve during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Thanks for your time, again, and good luck. Luna Santin 10:05, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
 | Hi mate, if you're a fan of Aussie rules, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL (join by adding your name to the list of participants). Also take a look at Category:VFL/AFL players and feel free to drop me a line with any questions, or on the WP:AFL discussion page. Cheers! |
Caroline Wilson
editPlease see the guidelines on biographies of living persons about removing unreferenced material. If you want to add it back make sure it has proper attribution to a verifiable, 3rd party source. --Steve (Stephen) talk 21:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Caro Wilson
editHey TKoS. I just wanted to respond to the edit summary you left me here in which you wrote: "please don't remove large sections without discussion, as per wiki policy." I tried to be clear in my own edit summary that I was removing material in accord with our biographies of living people policy which states: "Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material — whether negative, positive, or just highly questionable — about living persons should be removed immediately and without discussion...". Also, Wikipedia's verifiability policy states: "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material." In future, please don't restore unreferenced material to articles, particularly controversial or negative material to biographies of living people, unless you are prepared to find and cite some reliable sources. Thanks, Sarah 10:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
AfD Nomination: Abir (martial art)
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Abir (martial art) meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.
Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abir (martial art). Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.
Discussions such as these usually last five days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. IZAK 12:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Galus Australis
edit
A tag has been placed on Galus Australis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Somno (talk) 09:00, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Galus Australis
editHi there The Kasparov of Sheshbesh! I saw that you added a {{hangon}} tag to a page which you created, Galus Australis. This is good, but in the process you removed the tag requesting deletion under CSD A7. Even though there is a hangon on the page, the deletion template should remain there. But don't worry, this doesn't mean that the page is going to get deleted. Make sure you edit the talk page of the page nominated for deletion, located at Talk:Galus Australis, administrators will look at your reason why the page should remain before they decide what to do. Thanks - SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear User:The Kasparov of Sheshbesh
As a member of the "WikiProject Australian rules football" it would be good to hear your opinion on a current debate occurring on the 2018 AFL season talk page.
The debate centres around whether or not a third column should be included in the club attendance table to display "home state games vs. interstate opposition".
The main justification is that Victorian clubs play on average 7 home derbies each year compared to non-victorian clubs who play only 1 home derby each year. This provides an average home figure for Victorian clubs which is inflated as their home games have the fans of other Victorian clubs attending.
Please provide whether you support or oppose this proposal for the third column in AFL Club attendance tables.
Sincerely: Thejoebloggsblog (talk) 05:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)