The Masked Man of Mega Might

Arun Jaitley

Removed the line causing the issue Sankeykool 09:06, 04 June 2016 (UTC)

Vasundhara Raje

Have written the aravalli hills scam in own langauge. Drop me a message on my talk page if you want to discuss before removing anything. Sankeykool 09:01, 04 June 2016 (UTC)

Harbhajan Singh Khalsa

This may not be in your interest area but the article is essentially a hagiography and in brief spurts attracts the detractors to derail it. I tried some sort of clean up around this area a few years back (3HO, Kundalini yoga are a couple of other related articles) but the disciples get back quite soon. If you think you can spray some Lysol on it and keep it that way, that'd be helpful. —SpacemanSpiff 09:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Good work so far, the article is readable now! Even if other issues remain, it is a remarkable improvement from a few hours ago. I have often thought of just stubbing it to a statement of existence, but I guess that would never have held long. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 11:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: I had half a mind to revert to this version from 2008 (the one before the biographer took over) and add in a couple of sentences from the Time profile and the obituaries for completeness. If history is any indication, the changes are definitely not going to stick and I don't think I have the energy or motivation to keep up with it, sorry. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I get that, the same reason I haven't done anything in a few years; but it's one of those things that keep bugging you every time it pops up on the watchlist and for some strange reason while I removed the other two I can't seem to drop this one off my watchlist! cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 19:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

The whole slew of articles that revolves around this character is just mind-numbing - Satkirin Kaur Khalsa, Shakti Parwha Kaur Khalsa, David Shannahoff-Khalsa, Krishna Kaur Khalsa. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 11:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

I haven't even looked at the other articles that are part of this walled garden. I only looked at the main three as I assumed the rest won't be general interest articles, any damage to credibility from those will only impact the devout. This is the state of affairs surrounding all the India related religious movements. Just look at the MSG sect page and their walled garden -- Dera Sacha Sauda or the older movement -- {{Ayyavazhi}}. If the latter is a standard for our coverage on Indian literature or theatre, I'd be real happy! —SpacemanSpiff 14:54, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

@SpacemanSpiff: MSG - ugh. I cleaned up DSS and two other pages but Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh is one article I wouldn't dare go anywhere near. We generally lack interested editors who are willing to deal with these religious movements or have some basic knowledge to make heads or tails of what goes on, yet somehow we are adept in attracting loons and caste warriors. I normally skip these articles in the hope that one day Sitush will come across and nuke them. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 17:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Well, I'm trying to nuke Shyam Lal Saxena via a PROD! Little acorns etc. - Sitush (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Cleaning up or even deleting the non-notable stuff is impossible, just see Akilam two which was kept at AfD! Caste stuff seems to be a lot better now than a few years back when we were essentially a mirror of Jatland wiki, the Gujjar Forum (now defunct) and various other sites. The lesser known clan articles are still bad, but at least the main ones seem to be in better shape. But the fight has shifted to the various kings, are the Cholas Vanniyars, Kallars, Agamudayars, or what not? I wonder if Fallon's "Do not play" Tonight show segment should be added to the GRRSI article! I'm just surprised that we haven't yet had any edit wars on Waheeda Rehman's ancestry! —SpacemanSpiff 17:42, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Meh, seems I spoke too soon, the dispute is there at the category level! —SpacemanSpiff 17:46, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks

I think I must have edited an older revision of Indus Valley Civilisation instead of editing the most recent version. (The perils of having twenty tabs open at once, I suppose!) Anyway, thanks for correcting my error. /wiae /tlk 15:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Saket Suman

The article has used relevant sources and talks about the works of a journalist. The published reports are from The Dawn, The Statesman and other credible newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johny Rhoods (talk • contribs) 10:07, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

FLC review request

Hi! Since you participated in a previous similar FLC, I would like to request you to review the List of Padma Bhushan award recipients (1980–89) as well and give your comments here. Thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Merging Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy with Indian 500 and 1000 rupee currency demonetisation

Why are you reverting my edit. What do you have in mind? --AdityaChanana (talk) 11:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, The Masked Man of Mega Might. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NITI Aayog logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NITI Aayog logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 10 August 2021 (UTC)