Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

edit

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!
- Scotsman talk 02:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Survivor Articles

edit

Just to tell you, you may want to wait to create articles of Survivior contestants. Many aren't notable, like the first person eliminated in a season. Just because they're on TV doesn't mean they deserve an article. Articles should be restricted to winners, anyone who does something really, really notable (like Mike Skupin getting Medivac'd), and people that have done something notable outside the show. TeckWizTalkContribs@ 18:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Paul is Dead

edit

Brilliant idea to create subarticles for the various "clues"; I've been wrestling with that overblown article for ages, but never thought of that. Give yourself a cigar and/or a pat on the back. My first thought, however, is that a separate article for clues from each album will be too much - how about just one article, say, Clues from the Paul is Dead hoax or something like that (terrible title, though)? - DavidWBrooks 01:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I assume you will trim to almost nothing the "clues" section in the main article when you're confident that the sub-articles are in good shape? Or do you want somebody else to do that part? - DavidWBrooks 12:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)Reply
I wouldn't do them completely, at least not on some of the most famous clues (Paul barefoot on Abbey Road, for example). Remember that most readers won't click through to the sub-articles, so we want to give them a taste of what sort of "clues" people find. It will probably take a bit of experimenting to get it right, though. - DavidWBrooks 01:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Jason A Silva

edit

Jason A Silva has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 05:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

It's not AfD, it's WP:PROD. There's nothing but the banner, which can be taken down by any one who contests the deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 03:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


"Paul is Dead" clues from Abbey Road andf similar articles

edit

Some articles you wrote, such as "Paul is Dead" clues from Abbey Road, are uncategorized. Please help improve them by adding them to one or more categories, so they may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the articles.Eli Falk 11:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

J.P. Calderon

edit

Hi, an article for Survivor: Cook Islands contestant J.P. Calderon is up for afd. Your opinions on the matter would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Scorpion 22:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Calvinism invitation

edit
You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Calvinism

The goal of WikiProject Calvinism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Calvinism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Calvinism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Calvinist traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

 

-- TimNelson 23:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Pancasila (politics)

edit

Hi. I reverted your edits to this article for three reasons. Firstly, the order of the five parts of Pancasila is fixed; secondly they are almost always numbered when written, and thirdly when Indonesians chant them, they say the numbers. I would therefore argue that the numbers are an integral part of the five sila. By the way, I belatedly saw your userbox about discussing changes - I hope this is polite enough :-) Regards Davidelit (talk) 06:37, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply